Frazzoni M, De Micheli E, Zentilin P, Savarino V
Divisione di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Ospedale S. Agostino, Modena, Italy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 1;20(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01998.x.
Patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn can be subdivided into non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn on the basis of abnormal and normal, respectively, oesophageal acid exposure. Different pathophysiological characteristics could explain the reportedly low efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional heartburn.
To assess if non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn are pathophysiologically distinguishable.
Oesophageal manometry and pH-monitoring were performed in 145 patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn, in 72 patients with erosive reflux disease, in 58 patients with complicated reflux disease, and in 60 controls.
Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (84 cases) and functional heartburn (61 cases) differed with regard to the prevalence of hiatal hernia (49% vs. 31%, P = 0.008), the mean lower oesophageal sphincter tone (18.5 vs. 28.4 mmHg, P < 0.05), and the number of upright diurnal acid refluxes lasting more than 5 min (3.6 vs. 0.37, P < 0.05). The results were very close in thenon-erosive reflux disease, erosive reflux disease and complicated reflux disease groups, whilst patients with functional heartburn were indistinguishable from controls.
Pathophysiological characteristics typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are found in patients with non-erosive reflux disease but not in patients with functional heartburn. This could explain the reportedly low efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional heartburn and suggests considering different management strategies.
内镜检查阴性的胃灼热患者可根据食管酸暴露异常和正常分别分为非糜烂性反流病和功能性胃灼热。不同的病理生理特征可以解释质子泵抑制剂在功能性胃灼热中疗效据报道较低的原因。
评估非糜烂性反流病和功能性胃灼热在病理生理学上是否可区分。
对145例内镜检查阴性的胃灼热患者、72例糜烂性反流病患者、58例复杂性反流病患者和60例对照者进行食管测压和pH监测。
非糜烂性反流病患者(84例)和功能性胃灼热患者(61例)在食管裂孔疝患病率(49%对31%,P = 0.008)、食管下括约肌平均张力(18.5对28.4 mmHg,P < 0.05)以及持续超过5分钟的直立日间酸反流次数(3.6对0.37,P < 0.05)方面存在差异。非糜烂性反流病、糜烂性反流病和复杂性反流病组的结果非常接近,而功能性胃灼热患者与对照组无法区分。
非糜烂性反流病患者具有胃食管反流病典型的病理生理特征,而功能性胃灼热患者则没有。这可以解释质子泵抑制剂在功能性胃灼热中疗效据报道较低的原因,并提示应考虑不同的治疗策略。