• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非糜烂性反流病患者的病理生理特征与功能性烧心患者不同。

Pathophysiological characteristics of patients with non-erosive reflux disease differ from those of patients with functional heartburn.

作者信息

Frazzoni M, De Micheli E, Zentilin P, Savarino V

机构信息

Divisione di Medicina Interna e Gastroenterologia, Ospedale S. Agostino, Modena, Italy.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 1;20(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01998.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01998.x
PMID:15225174
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn can be subdivided into non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn on the basis of abnormal and normal, respectively, oesophageal acid exposure. Different pathophysiological characteristics could explain the reportedly low efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional heartburn.

AIM

To assess if non-erosive reflux disease and functional heartburn are pathophysiologically distinguishable.

METHODS

Oesophageal manometry and pH-monitoring were performed in 145 patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn, in 72 patients with erosive reflux disease, in 58 patients with complicated reflux disease, and in 60 controls.

RESULTS

Patients with non-erosive reflux disease (84 cases) and functional heartburn (61 cases) differed with regard to the prevalence of hiatal hernia (49% vs. 31%, P = 0.008), the mean lower oesophageal sphincter tone (18.5 vs. 28.4 mmHg, P < 0.05), and the number of upright diurnal acid refluxes lasting more than 5 min (3.6 vs. 0.37, P < 0.05). The results were very close in thenon-erosive reflux disease, erosive reflux disease and complicated reflux disease groups, whilst patients with functional heartburn were indistinguishable from controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathophysiological characteristics typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease are found in patients with non-erosive reflux disease but not in patients with functional heartburn. This could explain the reportedly low efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in functional heartburn and suggests considering different management strategies.

摘要

背景

内镜检查阴性的胃灼热患者可根据食管酸暴露异常和正常分别分为非糜烂性反流病和功能性胃灼热。不同的病理生理特征可以解释质子泵抑制剂在功能性胃灼热中疗效据报道较低的原因。

目的

评估非糜烂性反流病和功能性胃灼热在病理生理学上是否可区分。

方法

对145例内镜检查阴性的胃灼热患者、72例糜烂性反流病患者、58例复杂性反流病患者和60例对照者进行食管测压和pH监测。

结果

非糜烂性反流病患者(84例)和功能性胃灼热患者(61例)在食管裂孔疝患病率(49%对31%,P = 0.008)、食管下括约肌平均张力(18.5对28.4 mmHg,P < 0.05)以及持续超过5分钟的直立日间酸反流次数(3.6对0.37,P < 0.05)方面存在差异。非糜烂性反流病、糜烂性反流病和复杂性反流病组的结果非常接近,而功能性胃灼热患者与对照组无法区分。

结论

非糜烂性反流病患者具有胃食管反流病典型的病理生理特征,而功能性胃灼热患者则没有。这可以解释质子泵抑制剂在功能性胃灼热中疗效据报道较低的原因,并提示应考虑不同的治疗策略。

相似文献

1
Pathophysiological characteristics of patients with non-erosive reflux disease differ from those of patients with functional heartburn.非糜烂性反流病患者的病理生理特征与功能性烧心患者不同。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 1;20(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01998.x.
2
Pathophysiological characteristics of the various forms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Spectrum disease or distinct phenotypic presentations?各种形式的胃食管反流病的病理生理特征。是谱系疾病还是不同的表型表现?
Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Sep;38(9):643-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.020. Epub 2006 Apr 14.
3
The extent of oesophageal acid exposure overlap among the different gastro-oesophageal reflux disease groups.不同胃食管反流病组之间食管酸暴露重叠的程度。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan 15;23(2):321-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02747.x.
4
The added value of quantitative analysis of on-therapy impedance-pH parameters in distinguishing refractory non-erosive reflux disease from functional heartburn.治疗中阻抗-pH 参数定量分析在鉴别难治性非糜烂性反流病与功能性烧心中的附加价值。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 Feb;24(2):141-6, e87. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2011.01800.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
5
Acid-related oesophageal sensitivity, not dysmotility, differentiates subgroups of patients with non-erosive reflux disease.与酸相关的食管敏感性而非动力障碍可区分非糜烂性反流病患者的亚组。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Mar 1;27(5):396-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03584.x. Epub 2007 Dec 7.
6
The added value of impedance-pH monitoring to Rome III criteria in distinguishing functional heartburn from non-erosive reflux disease.阻抗-pH 监测对罗马 III 标准在区分功能性烧心和非糜烂性反流病中的附加价值。
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Jul;43(7):542-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.01.016. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
7
Overweight is a risk factor for both erosive and non-erosive reflux disease.超重是侵蚀性和非侵蚀性反流病的一个风险因素。
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Dec;43(12):940-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2011.07.014. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
8
Effect of hiatal hernia on proximal oesophageal acid clearance in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients.食管裂孔疝对胃食管反流病患者近端食管酸清除的影响。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Mar 15;23(6):751-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02816.x.
9
Famotidine vs. omeprazole: a prospective randomized multicentre trial to determine efficacy in non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.法莫替丁与奥美拉唑对比:一项前瞻性随机多中心试验,以确定在非糜烂性胃食管反流病中的疗效。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 2:10-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02468.x.
10
Efficacy of famotidine and omeprazole in healing symptoms of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: randomized-controlled study of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.法莫替丁和奥美拉唑治疗非糜烂性胃食管反流病症状的疗效:胃食管反流病的随机对照研究
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 2:2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02467.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的病理生理学
Digestion. 2025 Jun 25:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000547023.
2
Esophageal motor abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disorders.胃食管反流病中的食管运动异常。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2024 Mar 26;36(2):120-126. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_209_23. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
3
Recent insights on functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity.关于功能性烧心和反流过敏的最新见解。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;38(4):417-422. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000846.
4
Evaluation of symptomatic reflux esophagitis in proton pump inhibitor users.质子泵抑制剂使用者中症状性反流性食管炎的评估。
Biomed Rep. 2019 May;10(5):277-282. doi: 10.3892/br.2019.1206. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
5
High-resolution manometry is superior to endoscopy and radiology in assessing and grading sliding hiatal hernia: A comparison with surgical in vivo evaluation.在评估和分级滑动性食管裂孔疝方面,高分辨率测压法优于内镜检查和放射学检查:与手术活体评估的比较。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Aug;6(7):981-989. doi: 10.1177/2050640618769160. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
6
The Rome IV versus Rome III criteria for heartburn diagnosis: A comparative study.用于胃灼热诊断的罗马IV与罗马III标准:一项对比研究。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Apr;6(3):358-366. doi: 10.1177/2050640617735084. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
7
Esophageal Motor Disorders Are a Strong and Independant Associated Factor of Barrett's Esophagus.食管运动障碍是巴雷特食管的一个强烈且独立的相关因素。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Apr 30;24(2):216-225. doi: 10.5056/jnm17090.
8
Update on Functional Heartburn.功能性烧心的最新进展
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2017 Dec;13(12):725-734.
9
Esophageal Impedance Monitoring: Clinical Pearls and Pitfalls.食管阻抗监测:临床要点与陷阱
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Sep;111(9):1245-56. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.256. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
10
Diagnosis and Management of Functional Heartburn.功能性烧心的诊断与管理
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;111(1):53-61; quiz 62. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.376. Epub 2016 Jan 5.