• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于功能性烧心和反流过敏的最新见解。

Recent insights on functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua.

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;38(4):417-422. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000846.

DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000000846
PMID:35762702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10810351/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Rome IV experts have proposed that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) should be diagnosed only in patients with abnormal esophageal acid exposure, and that reflux hypersensitivity (RH) and functional heartburn (FH) both should be considered functional conditions separate from GERD. Although past and recent evidence support that FH can be completely distinguished from GERD, the concept that RH is not GERD is highly questionable. This review attempts to provide current data on these issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many recent investigations have provided new data on the different pathophysiological features characterizing RH and FH. Major differences have emerged from analyses of impedance-pH monitoring studies using the novel impedance metrics of baseline impedance (an index of mucosal integrity) and the rate of postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic waves (a reflection of the integrity of esophageal chemical clearance).

SUMMARY

The better ability to interpret impedance-pH tracings together with earlier data on the different prevalence of microscopic esophagitis in RH and FH patients, and recent studies documenting poor therapeutic efficacy of pain modulators and good results of antireflux surgery for RH support recategorization of RH within the GERD world. Further research is needed to correctly phenotype patients who have heartburn without mucosal breaks, and to guide their effective management.

摘要

目的综述

罗马 IV 专家提出,胃食管反流病(GERD)仅应在食管酸暴露异常的患者中诊断,而反流过度敏感(RH)和功能性烧心(FH)均应被视为与 GERD 分开的功能性疾病。尽管过去和最近的证据支持 FH 可以与 GERD 完全区分,但 RH 不是 GERD 的观点是非常值得怀疑的。这篇综述试图提供这些问题的最新数据。

最新发现

许多最近的研究提供了 RH 和 FH 的不同病理生理特征的新数据。使用新的阻抗指标基线阻抗(黏膜完整性指标)和反流后吞咽诱导蠕动波的速率(食管化学清除完整性的反映)对阻抗-pH 监测研究进行分析后,出现了主要差异。

总结

更好地解释阻抗-pH 图的能力,加上关于 RH 和 FH 患者微观食管炎不同患病率的早期数据,以及最近证明疼痛调节剂治疗效果不佳和抗反流手术治疗 RH 效果良好的研究,支持将 RH 重新分类为 GERD 范畴内的疾病。需要进一步研究来正确表型化无黏膜破裂的烧心患者,并指导他们的有效管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e618/10810351/044482a50b42/cogas-38-417-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e618/10810351/044482a50b42/cogas-38-417-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e618/10810351/044482a50b42/cogas-38-417-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Recent insights on functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity.关于功能性烧心和反流过敏的最新见解。
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2022 Jul 1;38(4):417-422. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000846.
2
Overlap of functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease.功能性烧心和反流超敏与已证实的胃食管反流病的重叠。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jun;33(6):e14056. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14056. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
3
The added diagnostic value of postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance in refractory reflux disease studied with on-therapy impedance-pH monitoring.在治疗期间进行阻抗- pH监测研究反流后吞咽诱发蠕动波指数和夜间基线阻抗对难治性反流病的附加诊断价值。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Mar;29(3). doi: 10.1111/nmo.12947. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
4
Postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and nocturnal baseline impedance can link PPI-responsive heartburn to reflux better than acid exposure time.反流吞咽诱发蠕动波指数和夜间基础阻抗比酸暴露时间更能将质子泵抑制剂反应性烧心与反流联系起来。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Nov;29(11). doi: 10.1111/nmo.13116. Epub 2017 May 25.
5
Impedance-pH Monitoring for Diagnosis of Reflux Disease: New Perspectives.阻抗-pH监测在反流性疾病诊断中的应用:新视角
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Aug;62(8):1881-1889. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4625-8. Epub 2017 May 26.
6
Impairment of chemical clearance and mucosal integrity distinguishes hypersensitive esophagus from functional heartburn.化学清除功能和黏膜完整性受损将高敏性食管与功能性烧心区分开来。
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr;52(4):444-451. doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1226-9. Epub 2016 May 30.
7
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Diagnosis by New Consensus in Clinical Practice: The Additional Value of Mean Basal Impedance.胃食管反流病临床实践新共识诊断:平均基础阻抗的附加价值。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(3):261-265. doi: 10.1159/000517987. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Association between post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and esophageal mucosal integrity in patients with GERD symptoms.胃食管反流病症状患者反流后吞咽诱发蠕动波指数与食管黏膜完整性之间的关联
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Jan;35(1):e14344. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14344. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
9
Esophageal reflux hypersensitivity: Non-GERD or still GERD?食管反流过敏:非 GERD 还是仍然是 GERD?
Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Dec;52(12):1413-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
10
Applying Lyon Consensus criteria in the work-up of patients with proton pump inhibitory-refractory heartburn.根据 Lyon 共识标准对质子泵抑制剂难治性烧心患者进行检查。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jun;55(11):1423-1430. doi: 10.1111/apt.16838. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病的病理生理学
Digestion. 2025 Jun 25:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000547023.
2
Hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate-based medical devices: formulations, esophageal mucosal protection, and their place in the management of GERD.基于透明质酸和硫酸软骨素的医疗器械:制剂、食管黏膜保护及其在胃食管反流病管理中的地位。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 11;18:17562848251337822. doi: 10.1177/17562848251337822. eCollection 2025.
3
The Clinical Spectrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Facts and Fictions.

本文引用的文献

1
2020 Seoul Consensus on the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.《2020年胃食管反流病诊断与管理首尔共识》
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct 30;27(4):453-481. doi: 10.5056/jnm21077.
2
The tapestry of reflux syndromes: translating new insight into clinical practice.反流综合征的全貌:将新见解转化为临床实践。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Sep 30;71(711):470-473. doi: 10.3399/bjgp21X717329. Print 2021 Oct.
3
Oesophageal hypervigilance and visceral anxiety relate to reflux symptom severity and psychological distress but not to acid reflux parameters.
胃食管反流病的临床谱:事实与虚构
Visc Med. 2024 Oct;40(5):242-249. doi: 10.1159/000536583. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
食管过度警觉和内脏焦虑与反流症状严重程度及心理困扰相关,但与酸反流参数无关。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Oct;54(7):923-930. doi: 10.1111/apt.16561. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Application of Lyon Consensus criteria for GORD diagnosis: evaluation of conventional and new impedance-pH parameters. Lyon 共识标准在 GORD 诊断中的应用:常规和新的阻抗-pH 参数评估。
Gut. 2022 Jun;71(6):1062-1067. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325531. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
5
Overlap of functional heartburn and reflux hypersensitivity with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease.功能性烧心和反流超敏与已证实的胃食管反流病的重叠。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Jun;33(6):e14056. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14056. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
6
Esophageal reflux hypersensitivity: Non-GERD or still GERD?食管反流过敏:非 GERD 还是仍然是 GERD?
Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Dec;52(12):1413-1420. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
A SIGE-SINGEM-AIGO technical review on the clinical use of esophageal reflux monitoring.食管反流监测临床应用的 SIGE-SINGEM-AIGO 技术评价
Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Sep;52(9):966-980. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.031. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
8
Identification of Different Phenotypes of Esophageal Reflux Hypersensitivity and Implications for Treatment.食管反流高敏不同表型的识别及其治疗意义
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Apr;19(4):690-698.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.063. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
9
Untangling Nonerosive Reflux Disease From Functional Heartburn.从功能性烧心症中理清非糜烂性反流病。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jul;19(7):1314-1326. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.03.057. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
10
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Functional Heartburn: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:功能性烧心症专家评论
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2286-2293. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.01.034. Epub 2020 Feb 1.