McNaughton Neil, Corr Philip J
Department Psychology and Neuroscience Research Centre, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56 Dunedin, New Zealand.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 May;28(3):285-305. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005.
We present in this paper a picture of the neural systems controlling defense that updates and simplifies Gray's "Neuropsychology of Anxiety". It is based on two behavioural dimensions: 'defensive distance' as defined by the Blanchards and 'defensive direction'. Defensive direction is a categorical dimension with avoidance of threat corresponding to fear and approach to threat corresponding to anxiety. These two psychological dimensions are mapped to underlying neural dimensions. Defensive distance is mapped to neural level, with the shortest defensive distances involving the lowest neural level (periaqueductal grey) and the largest defensive distances the highest neural level (prefrontal cortex). Defensive direction is mapped to separate parallel streams that run across these levels. A significant departure from prior models is the proposal that both fear and anxiety are represented at all levels. The theory is presented in a simplified form that does not incorporate the interactions that must occur between non-adjacent levels of the system. It also requires expansion to include the dimension of escapability of threat. Our current development and these proposed future extensions do not change the core concepts originally proposed by Gray and, we argue, demonstrate their enduring value.
我们在本文中呈现了一幅控制防御的神经系统图景,它更新并简化了格雷的《焦虑神经心理学》。它基于两个行为维度:由布兰查德夫妇定义的“防御距离”和“防御方向”。防御方向是一个分类维度,对威胁的回避对应恐惧,对威胁的接近对应焦虑。这两个心理维度被映射到潜在的神经维度。防御距离被映射到神经层面,最短的防御距离涉及最低的神经层面(导水管周围灰质),最长的防御距离涉及最高的神经层面(前额叶皮质)。防御方向被映射到贯穿这些层面的不同并行信息流。与先前模型的一个显著不同之处在于,该模型提出恐惧和焦虑在所有层面都有体现。该理论以简化形式呈现,未纳入系统非相邻层面之间必然发生的相互作用。它还需要扩展以纳入威胁可逃避性的维度。我们当前的进展以及这些提议的未来扩展并未改变格雷最初提出的核心概念,并且我们认为,这证明了这些概念的持久价值。