Suppr超能文献

多西他赛对比多西他赛联合顺铂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌患者一线治疗的随机、多中心III期试验

Docetaxel versus docetaxel plus cisplatin as front-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, multicenter phase III trial.

作者信息

Georgoulias Vassilis, Ardavanis Alexandros, Agelidou Athina, Agelidou Maria, Chandrinos Vassilis, Tsaroucha Emilia, Toumbis Michael, Kouroussis Charalambos, Syrigos Konstantinos, Polyzos Aristidis, Samaras Nikolaos, Papakotoulas Pavlos, Christofilakis Charalambos, Ziras Nicolaos, Alegakis Athanasios

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 1;22(13):2602-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.11.004.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) or docetaxel (D) alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either DC (n = 167; docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 2, and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) 150 microg/m(2)/d on days 3 to 9) or D (n = 152; 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 without rhG-CSF) every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

The overall response rates were 36.5% for DC (three complete responses and 58 partial responses) and 21.7% for D (one complete response and 32 partial responses; P =.004). The median OS was 10.5 months (range, 0.5 to 41 months) and 8.0 months (range, 0.5 to 41 months) for DC and D, respectively (P =.200). The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 44% and 19% for DC and 43% and 15% for D, respectively. Median times to tumor progression were 4.0 and 2.5 months for DC and D, respectively (P =.580). Grade 2/3 anemia was significantly higher with DC than with D (33% v 16%; P =.0001). Fifteen (9%) DC and 12 (8%) D patients developed febrile neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting (P =.0001), diarrhea (P =.007), neurotoxicity (P =.017), and nephroroxicity (P =.006) were significantly more common with DC than with D. There were five treatment-related deaths in the DC group and one in the D (P =.098).

CONCLUSION

DC regimen resulted in a higher response rate but without improvement in median time to tumor progression or OS compared with D. D could be a reasonable front-line chemotherapy for patients who cannot tolerate cisplatin.

摘要

目的

比较多西他赛联合顺铂(DC)或单用多西他赛(D)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)。

患者与方法

既往未接受过化疗的晚期/转移性NSCLC患者被随机分配接受DC方案(n = 167;第1天多西他赛100 mg/m²,第2天顺铂80 mg/m²,第3至9天重组人粒细胞集落刺激因子(rhG-CSF)150 μg/m²/d)或D方案(n = 152;第1天100 mg/m²,不使用rhG-CSF),每3周一次。

结果

DC方案的总缓解率为36.5%(3例完全缓解和58例部分缓解),D方案为21.7%(1例完全缓解和32例部分缓解;P = 0.004)。DC组和D组的中位OS分别为10.5个月(范围0.5至41个月)和8.0个月(范围0.5至41个月)(P = 0.200)。DC组1年和2年生存率分别为44%和19%,D组分别为43%和15%。DC组和D组的肿瘤进展中位时间分别为4.0个月和2.5个月(P = 0.580)。DC组2/3级贫血显著高于D组(33%对16%;P = 0.0001)。15例(9%)DC组患者和12例(8%)D组患者发生发热性中性粒细胞减少。DC组3/4级恶心/呕吐(P = 0.0001)、腹泻(P = 0.007)、神经毒性(P = 0.017)和肾毒性(P = 0.006)显著多于D组。DC组有5例治疗相关死亡,D组有1例(P = 0.098)。

结论

与D方案相比,DC方案缓解率更高,但肿瘤进展中位时间或OS无改善。对于不能耐受顺铂的患者,D方案可能是合理的一线化疗方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验