Huemer Florian, Lang David, Westphal Theresa, Gampenrieder Simon Peter, Hutarew Georg, Weiss Lukas, Hackl Hubert, Lamprecht Bernd, Rinnerthaler Gabriel, Greil Richard
Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute-Laboratory for Immunological and Molecular Cancer Research (SCRI-LIMCR), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.
Department of Pulmonology, Kepler University Hospital, Med Campus III, 4020 Linz, Austria.
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 10;8(7):1014. doi: 10.3390/jcm8071014.
Immune-checkpoint blockade in front-line or second-line treatment improves survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) when compared with chemotherapy alone. However, easily applicable predictive parameters are necessary to guide immune-checkpoint inhibition in clinical practice. In this retrospective bi-centric analysis, we investigated the impact of baseline patient and tumor characteristics on clinical outcome in aNSCLC patients treated with programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Between May 2015 and January 2018, 142 unselected consecutive NSCLC patients received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors during the course of disease. In multivariate analysis, we identified the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (ECOG > 1 versus ECOG ≤ 1, HR: 3.23, 95%CI: 1.58-6.60, = 0.001), baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC; high: >0.93 × 10/L versus low: ≤ 0.93 × 10/L, HR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.23-0.62, < 0.001), prior or concomitant anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeting therapy (yes versus no, HR: 2.18, 95%CI: 1.15-4.14, = 0.017) and TNM stage (IV versus III, HR: 4.18, 95%CI: 1.01-17.36, = 0.049) as the most relevant parameters for survival. Neither antibiotic exposure (antibiotic-positive versus antibiotic-negative, HR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.56-1.45, = 0.675), nor PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1% versus <1%, HR: 0.68, 95%CI: 0.41-1.13, = 0.140) was associated with survival. Baseline ECOG performance status and ALC were associated with survival in aNSCLC patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and assessment of these parameters could be suitable in clinical practice.
与单纯化疗相比,一线或二线治疗中采用免疫检查点阻断可提高晚期非小细胞肺癌(aNSCLC)患者的生存率。然而,在临床实践中,需要易于应用的预测参数来指导免疫检查点抑制治疗。在这项回顾性双中心分析中,我们研究了基线患者和肿瘤特征对接受程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)/程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂治疗的aNSCLC患者临床结局的影响。2015年5月至2018年1月期间,142例未经选择的连续NSCLC患者在疾病过程中接受了PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗。在多变量分析中,我们确定东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(ECOG>1与ECOG≤1,HR:3.23,95%CI:1.58 - 6.60,P = 0.001)、基线绝对淋巴细胞计数(ALC;高:>0.93×10⁹/L与低:≤0.93×10⁹/L,HR:0.38,95%CI:0.23 - 0.62,P<0.001)、既往或同时进行的抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)靶向治疗(是与否,HR:2.18,95%CI:1.15 - 4.14,P = 0.017)以及TNM分期(IV期与III期,HR:4.18,95%CI:1.01 - 17.36,P = 0.049)是生存的最相关参数。抗生素暴露情况(抗生素阳性与抗生素阴性,HR:0.90,95%CI:0.56 - 1.45,P = 0.675)以及肿瘤细胞上的PD-L1表达(≥1%与<1%,HR:0.68,95%CI:0.41 - 1.13,P = 0.140)均与生存无关。基线ECOG体能状态和ALC与接受PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗的aNSCLC患者的生存相关,对这些参数的评估在临床实践中可能是合适的。