Fujitani R M, Mills J L, Wang L M, Taylor S M
SGHSG/Section of Vascular Surgery, Wilford Hall USAF Medical Center, Lackland AFB, Texas 78236-5300.
J Vasc Surg. 1992 Sep;16(3):459-67; discussion 467-8.
To determine the influence of unilateral internal carotid arterial occlusion (ICO) on Doppler frequency spectral analysis (DFSA) of the patent contralateral carotid artery, a retrospective review of 154 patients between July 1987 and December 1991 with angiographically confirmed ICO was performed, correlating duplex and arteriographic findings in a blinded fashion. Biplane arteriograms and bilateral carotid artery duplex studies that used a 5.0 MHz Doppler probe with a 1.5 mm3 sample volume at a 60 degree angle of insonation were performed on all patients. Each carotid artery was categorized by the severity of stenosis as quantified by arteriography: 1% to 15% (n = 41); 16% to 49% (n = 48), 50% to 79% (n = 21), 80% to 99% (n = 34), and bilateral occlusion (n = 10). DFSA peak systolic frequencies were commonly exaggerated in the presence of contralateral ICO and use of standard criteria for DFSA interpretation overestimated bifurcation stenoses in 43 of 89 lesions (48.3%) when determining nonhemodynamically significant lesions (less than 50% diameter reduction) with a sensitivity of only 57.3% and specificity of 96.9%. Conversely, prediction of hemodynamically significant lesions (greater than 50% diameter reduction) with standard criteria had 96.9% sensitivity but only 57.3% specificity. Modification of these criteria to account for the velocity increase or "jet effect" in the ipsilateral carotid artery system increased the sensitivity and specificity to 97.8% in predicting nonhemodynamically and hemodynamically significant stenoses respectively. A Doppler frequency spectrum with a peak systolic frequency (PSF) greater than 4.0 kHz and end-diastolic frequency (EDF) less than 5 kHz with an "open window" distinguished lesions with less than 50% diameter reduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了确定单侧颈内动脉闭塞(ICO)对健侧颈总动脉多普勒频谱分析(DFSA)的影响,我们回顾性分析了1987年7月至1991年12月间154例经血管造影证实为ICO的患者,以盲法对比双功能超声和血管造影结果。所有患者均接受双平面血管造影及双侧颈动脉双功能超声检查,使用5.0 MHz多普勒探头,在60°超声入射角下,取样容积为1.5 mm³。每条颈动脉根据血管造影量化的狭窄程度进行分类:1%至15%(n = 41);16%至49%(n = 48),50%至79%(n = 21),80%至99%(n = 34),以及双侧闭塞(n = 10)。在对侧存在ICO时,DFSA的收缩期峰值频率通常会被夸大,并且在使用DFSA解读标准判断非血流动力学显著病变(直径缩小小于50%)时,89个病变中有43个(48.3%)对分叉处狭窄的估计过高,其敏感性仅为57.3%,特异性为96.9%。相反,用标准标准预测血流动力学显著病变(直径缩小大于50%)时,敏感性为96.9%,但特异性仅为57.3%。对这些标准进行修正,以考虑同侧颈动脉系统中的速度增加或“喷射效应”,在预测非血流动力学和血流动力学显著狭窄时,敏感性和特异性分别提高到了97.8%。收缩期峰值频率(PSF)大于4.0 kHz且舒张末期频率(EDF)小于5 kHz并伴有“开放窗”的多普勒频谱可区分直径缩小小于50%的病变。(摘要截断于250字)