Suppr超能文献

颈动脉分叉处的彩色多普勒、双功超声检查及血管造影。前瞻性双盲研究。

Colour Doppler and duplex sonography and angiography of the carotid artery bifurcations. Prospective, double-blind study.

作者信息

Bray J M, Galland F, Lhoste P, Nicolau S, Dubas F, Emile J, Pillet J

机构信息

Laboratory of Physiology, University Hospital, Angers, France.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 1995 Apr;37(3):219-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01578261.

Abstract

We undertook a prospective double-blind study of 128 carotid artery bifurcations using colour Doppler and duplex sonography and angiography. Sixty-four patients with cerebrovascular events were admitted for angiography. All underwent sonography within 24 h of angiography. Standard duplex sonography and colour Doppler imaging without spectral analysis were performed, on the same device, by two sonographers, using defined morphological and haemodynamic criteria. Digital radiological data on vessel diameter were interpreted independently by two radiologists. The two sonographic methods gave similar grading of stenosis, compared to angiography, with an accuracy ranging from 96% in severe to 83% in minor stenoses. Colour Doppler studies gave better area measurements than standard duplex sonography, except for major stenoses. Discrepancies between ultrasonography and angiography were due mainly to minor stenoses and large plaques of calcification on the vessel walls, which masked very segmental 70% stenoses in 2 cases. Angiography is limited by its own resolution, does not show uncalcified vessel walls and does not give cross-sectional data. It would therefore be inappropriate for showing small plaques, the full extent of ectasia or for defining the carotid bulb accurately. The advantages of colour methods were in investigating sinuous or deep vessels and hypoechoic plaques. Analysis of the residual lumen of a stenosis and its extent could be determined more rapidly. Haemodynamic quantification of stenoses by standard duplex sonography may be difficult because of limited sample volume and error in estimation of angle, whereas colour Doppler allows semiquantitative estimation of haemodynamics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们采用彩色多普勒、双功超声和血管造影术对128个颈动脉分叉处进行了前瞻性双盲研究。64例脑血管事件患者接受了血管造影术。所有人在血管造影术后24小时内接受了超声检查。由两名超声检查人员使用同一设备,依据既定的形态学和血流动力学标准,进行了标准双功超声检查和无频谱分析的彩色多普勒成像。两名放射科医生独立解读关于血管直径的数字放射学数据。与血管造影术相比,两种超声检查方法对狭窄程度的分级相似,重度狭窄时的准确率为96%,轻度狭窄时为83%。除了重度狭窄外,彩色多普勒检查在面积测量方面比标准双功超声检查更好。超声检查与血管造影术之间的差异主要是由于轻度狭窄和血管壁上的大钙化斑块,在2例中这些斑块掩盖了局部70%的狭窄。血管造影术受其自身分辨率的限制,无法显示未钙化的血管壁,也无法提供横断面数据。因此,它不适用于显示小斑块、扩张的全貌或准确界定颈动脉球部。彩色检查方法的优势在于研究弯曲或深部血管以及低回声斑块。可以更快地确定狭窄残余腔及其范围的分析。由于样本体积有限和角度估计误差,通过标准双功超声对狭窄进行血流动力学定量可能很困难,而彩色多普勒允许对血流动力学进行半定量估计。(摘要截选于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验