Bos Jaap, Groenendijk Leendert
Interdisciplinary Social Science (ASW) Department, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Int J Psychoanal. 2004 Jun;85(Pt 3):713-29. doi: 10.1516/002075704774200825.
In the early history of psychoanalysis, the work of Wilhelm Stekel (1868-1940) was by and large neglected, even though he wrote a considerable number of psychoanalytic studies, some of which should be considered to have had a major influence on Freud's early thought. Freud, in turn, had much greater influence on Stekel than is commonly believed. In this article, the authors aim to uncover some of these mutual influences, in particular in the field of practice, by focusing on the elements of autobiography and self-analysis. The authors have identified a number of covert autobiographical passages in the work of Stekel, and attempt to link one of these 'revelations' to an equally covert response to it by Freud. In the closing section of this article, the authors argue that Stekel's attempt to imitate Freud's self-analysis contributed to the fracture between the two of them.
在精神分析学的早期历史中,威廉·施泰克尔(1868 - 1940)的著作大体上被忽视了,尽管他撰写了大量精神分析研究著作,其中一些著作应该被认为对弗洛伊德的早期思想产生了重大影响。反过来,弗洛伊德对施泰克尔的影响比人们普遍认为的要大得多。在本文中,作者旨在通过关注自传和自我分析的元素,揭示其中一些相互影响,特别是在实践领域。作者在施泰克尔的作品中发现了一些隐蔽的自传性段落,并试图将其中一个这样的“揭示”与弗洛伊德对其同样隐蔽的回应联系起来。在本文的结尾部分,作者认为施泰克尔模仿弗洛伊德自我分析的尝试导致了两人之间的决裂。