Saltvedt S, Almström H, Kublickas M, Reilly M, Valentin L, Grunewald C
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at South Stockholm General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;24(1):42-50. doi: 10.1002/uog.1047.
To determine the accuracy of established ultrasound dating formulae when used at 12-14 and 15-20 gestational weeks.
A total of 363 singleton pregnancies conceived after in-vitro fertilization (IVF) and randomized to a dating scan at 12-14 or 15-20 gestational weeks were studied. 'True' gestational age was calculated on the basis of the day of oocyte retrieval and was compared to gestational age calculated on the basis of seven dating formulae including the fetal biparietal diameter (BPD) and three dating formulae including BPD and fetal femur length (FL). The mean of the differences between estimated and true gestational age (systematic measurement error) and their SD (random measurement error) were calculated for each formula.
Three formulae showed systematic errors of less than -0.7 days at both early and late scanning. Two formulae overestimated gestational age at both early and late scanning by 5.7 and 3.1 vs. 2.3 and 2.8 days, respectively, while five formulae manifested very different systematic errors at early and late scanning. The formulae used for clinical management underestimated gestational age by a mean of 3 days when dating was performed at 12-14 weeks, and by a mean of 0.8 days when dating was done at 15-20 weeks. The random error was on average 1 day less when the scan was carried out early (2 vs. 3 days; P < 0.0005). Mean true gestational age at delivery in IVF pregnancies with spontaneous start of labor was 279 days (SD 12.9); excluding preterm deliveries it was 281 days (SD 8.1).
Ultrasound dating formulae originally intended for use in the middle of the second trimester do not necessarily perform well when used for dating earlier in gestation. The systematic and random error of any dating formula must be assessed for the gestational age interval in which the formula is intended to be used.
确定既定超声孕周计算公式在妊娠12 - 14周和15 - 20周时使用的准确性。
共研究了363例体外受精(IVF)后单胎妊娠,这些妊娠被随机分配在妊娠12 - 14周或15 - 20周进行孕周扫描。“真实”孕周根据取卵日计算,并与基于包括胎儿双顶径(BPD)在内的七个孕周计算公式以及包括BPD和胎儿股骨长度(FL)在内的三个孕周计算公式所计算的孕周进行比较。计算每个公式估计孕周与真实孕周之间差异的平均值(系统测量误差)及其标准差(随机测量误差)。
三个公式在早期和晚期扫描时均显示系统误差小于 -0.7天。两个公式在早期和晚期扫描时均高估孕周,分别为5.7天和3.1天,而另外两个公式高估2.3天和2.8天,同时五个公式在早期和晚期扫描时表现出非常不同的系统误差。用于临床管理的公式在12 - 14周进行孕周测定时平均低估孕周3天,在15 - 20周进行孕周测定时平均低估0.8天。早期进行扫描时随机误差平均少1天(2天对3天;P < 0.0005)。自然发动分娩的IVF妊娠分娩时的平均真实孕周为279天(标准差12.9);排除早产病例后为281天(标准差8.1)。
最初用于妊娠中期的超声孕周计算公式在妊娠早期使用时不一定表现良好。任何孕周计算公式的系统误差和随机误差都必须针对其 intended使用的孕周区间进行评估。