Gerritsen Debby, Ooms Marcel, Steverink Nardi, Frijters Dinnus, Bezemer Dick, Ribbe Miel
VU medisch centrum Amsterdam, Instituut voor Extramuraal Geneeskundig Onderzoek, afdeling Verpleeghuisgeneeskunde.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 2004 Apr;35(2):55-64.
The reliability and validity of three MDS scales for ADL, cognition and depression are described. The scales consist of items of the Minimum Data Set of the Resident Assessment Instrument and are available just after an MDS assessment. Data collection took place in nine Dutch nursing homes (N = 227) and consisted of three MDS assessments within one month to determine reliability. Several criterion measures were assessed in order to determine convergent validity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were determined as well as correlation coefficients of the criterion measures and the MDS scales. All three MDS scales appear reliable, especially the ADL-Hierarchy has very good psychometric properties (intra- and inter-rater Intra Class Correlation were 0.81 and 0.83, respectively). Convergent validity of the ADL-Hierarchy and the Cognitive Performance Scale is good, the Depression Rating Scale appears valid in residents with moderate cognitive disorders at the most, but the results are more difficult to interpret in residents with severe cognitive disorders. The MDS scales appear useful in clinical practice and for research purposes in the Dutch nursing homes.
描述了用于日常生活活动能力(ADL)、认知和抑郁的三种最低数据集(MDS)量表的信度和效度。这些量表由居民评估工具的最低数据集项目组成,在MDS评估后即可获得。数据收集在荷兰的九家养老院进行(N = 227),包括在一个月内进行三次MDS评估以确定信度。评估了几种效标测量方法以确定收敛效度。确定了评分者内信度和评分者间信度以及内部一致性,以及效标测量方法与MDS量表的相关系数。所有三种MDS量表看起来都是可靠的,尤其是ADL层次量表具有非常好的心理测量特性(评分者内和评分者间组内相关系数分别为0.81和0.83)。ADL层次量表和认知表现量表的收敛效度良好,抑郁评定量表在认知障碍程度适中的居民中最多表现出效度,但在重度认知障碍居民中的结果更难解释。MDS量表在荷兰养老院的临床实践和研究目的中似乎很有用。