Suppr超能文献

养老院认知障碍评估:一种简短精神状态评估工具的开发与测试

Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: development and testing of a brief instrument of mental status.

作者信息

Chodosh Joshua, Edelen Maria Orlando, Buchanan Joan L, Yosef Julia Ann, Ouslander Joseph G, Berlowitz Dan R, Streim Joel E, Saliba Debra

机构信息

Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Nov;56(11):2069-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01944.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To test the accuracy of a brief cognitive assessment of nursing home (NH) residents and to determine whether facility nurses can reliably perform this assessment.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, independent cognitive screening tests with NH residents.

SETTING

Six Department of Veteran Affairs nursing facilities.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred seventy-four residents from six regionally distributed Veteran Affairs NHs.

MEASUREMENTS

Three cognitive assessment instruments: the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), created for this study; the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 2.0 Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), and the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) as the criterion standard. The 15-point BIMS tests memory and orientation and includes free and cued recall items. Research assistants administered the 3MS and BIMS to all subjects. Facility nurses administered the same BIMS to a subsample.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-four of 417 (89.7%) residents approached completed the 3MS and research assistant-administered BIMS (BIMS-R); 212 residents also received a facility nurse-administered BIMS (BIMS-N). The BIMS-R was more highly correlated with the 3MS than was the CPS (Pearson correlation coefficient (r)=0.79 vs 0.62; P<.01 for difference). For the subset who received facility assessments, the BIMS-N was also more highly correlated with the 3MS (Pearson r=0.74 vs 0.65; P<.01 for difference). For any impairment (3MS<78), the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.86 for the BIMS, versus 0.77 for the CPS. For severe impairment (3MS<48) the AUC was 0.94, versus 0.85 for the CPS.

CONCLUSION

In this population, a brief cognitive test is a more accurate approach to cognitive assessment than the current observational methods employed using the MDS 2.0.

摘要

目的

测试一项针对养老院(NH)居民的简短认知评估的准确性,并确定机构护士是否能够可靠地进行此项评估。

设计

对NH居民进行横断面、独立的认知筛查测试。

设置

六个退伍军人事务部护理机构。

参与者

来自六个区域分布的退伍军人事务NH的374名居民。

测量

三种认知评估工具:为本研究创建的简易精神状态访谈(BIMS);最小数据集(MDS)2.0认知表现量表(CPS),以及改良的简易精神状态检查(3MS)作为标准参照。研究助理对所有受试者进行3MS和BIMS测试。机构护士对一个子样本进行相同的BIMS测试。

结果

417名被邀请的居民中有374名(89.7%)完成了3MS和研究助理实施的BIMS(BIMS-R);212名居民还接受了机构护士实施的BIMS(BIMS-N)。与CPS相比,BIMS-R与3MS的相关性更高(Pearson相关系数(r)=0.79对0.62;差异P<0.01)。对于接受机构评估的子集,BIMS-N与3MS的相关性也更高(Pearson r=0.74对0.65;差异P<0.01)。对于任何损伤(3MS<78),BIMS的受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.86,而CPS为0.77。对于严重损伤(3MS<48),AUC为0.94,而CPS为0.85。

结论

在该人群中,一项简短的认知测试比目前使用MDS 2.0的观察方法在认知评估方面更为准确。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验