Szirony Tracy A, Price James H, Wolfe Elisabeth, Telljohann Susan K, Dake Joseph A
School of Nursing, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo, Ohio 43614-5803, USA.
J Nurs Educ. 2004 Jun;43(6):270-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20040601-03.
A major premise of any research activity is that ethical conduct will be identified and observed during the research process. Yet a comprehensive review of the nursing literature failed to find any research assessing nurses' perceptions of ethical issues related to authorship, publication, reporting results, or funding. This study assessed nursing faculty members' perceptions of ethical scenarios related to the areas of authorship, publication, reporting results, and funding. A 34-item questionnaire, consisting of ethical issues related to research, was mailed to a national random sample of nursing faculty who were teaching at graduate degree-granting institutions. A three-wave mailing was used to maximize response rate. A total of 388 nurses responded to the survey (77.6% response rate). Less than half of the respondents reported that content included in their curriculum was related to the issues under study. Respondents' perceptions of the ethical scenarios varied. A majority of the respondents considered six of the scenarios ethical, eight unethical, one questionable, and one not an ethical issue. Five of the scenarios received widely varied responses. Faculty members who had chaired student dissertations found three questionnaire items significantly (p < .05) more unethical than faculty members who had not chaired dissertations. Faculty teaching in programs in which the highest degree offered was a doctorate found two items unethical significantly more often than faculty teaching at programs in which the highest degree offered was a master's degree. Results of this study demonstrate the potential that students are not being taught necessary issues related to ethical authorship and publication practices. Faculty members themselves may not have had the education needed to educate their own students in the area of research ethics.
任何研究活动的一个主要前提是,在研究过程中要识别并遵守道德行为规范。然而,对护理文献的全面回顾未能找到任何评估护士对与作者身份、发表、报告结果或资金相关的伦理问题看法的研究。本研究评估了护理教员对与作者身份、发表、报告结果和资金领域相关的伦理情景的看法。一份由34个项目组成的问卷,包含与研究相关的伦理问题,被邮寄给在授予研究生学位机构任教的全国随机抽样的护理教员。采用三轮邮寄以提高回复率。共有388名护士回复了调查(回复率为77.6%)。不到一半的受访者表示他们课程中包含的内容与所研究的问题相关。受访者对伦理情景的看法各不相同。大多数受访者认为其中六个情景是符合伦理的,八个是不符合伦理的,一个有疑问,一个不是伦理问题。其中五个情景得到了广泛不同的回复。担任过学生论文导师的教员发现,有三个问卷项目比未担任过论文导师的教员认为明显更不符合伦理(p < .05)。在提供最高学位为博士学位的项目中教学的教员比在提供最高学位为硕士学位的项目中教学的教员更频繁地认为有两个项目不符合伦理。本研究结果表明,学生可能没有被教授与伦理作者身份和发表实践相关的必要问题。教员自身可能也没有接受过在研究伦理领域教育自己学生所需的教育。