Chen Jun, Jiang Wen Ming, Gao Xiao Ling, Jiang Xinguo, Zhang Qi Zhi, Zheng Zhao Hua
Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2004 Apr-Jun;29(2):103-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03190583.
A bioequivalence study of two rabeprazole enteric-coated formulations was carried out in 20 healthy Chinese volunteers according to a single dose, two-sequence, crossover randomized design. The two formulations were administered in two treatment days, separated by a washout period of 7 days. Blood samples were collected at specified time intervals over 10 hours post-dosing. Plasma samples were separated and assayed for rabeprazole using a selective and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-T), AUCmax, Cmax, tmax, t(1/2) and MRT were determined from plasma concentration-time profile of both formulations. ANOVA and two one-sided t test procedures showed no significant difference in log-transformed Cmax, AUC(0-T) AUC(0-infinity) while the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratio of the geometric means of their values were also used to assess bioequivalence between the two formulations. The results of this study indicated that the two rabeprazole formulations can be considered to be bioequivalent.
按照单剂量、双序列、交叉随机设计,在20名健康中国志愿者中开展了两种雷贝拉唑肠溶制剂的生物等效性研究。两种制剂在两个治疗日给药,中间间隔7天的洗脱期。给药后10小时内按特定时间间隔采集血样。分离血浆样品,采用具有紫外检测功能的选择性灵敏高效液相色谱法测定雷贝拉唑含量。根据两种制剂的血浆浓度-时间曲线确定药代动力学参数AUC(0-T)、AUCmax、Cmax、tmax、t(1/2)和MRT。方差分析和双单侧t检验程序显示,对数转换后的Cmax、AUC(0-T)、AUC(0-∞)无显著差异,同时还使用其值几何均值比的90%置信区间(CI)来评估两种制剂之间的生物等效性。本研究结果表明,两种雷贝拉唑制剂可被认为具有生物等效性。