Shimizu Mitsue
Mood Disorder Program, Department of Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University, USA.
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2004;106(5):546-63.
Since the 19th century, many studies have reported on folie à deux (FAD) in subjects with endogenous psychosis. However, the etiology of FAD in patients with schizophrenia has remained unclear, primarily because the possible psychogenic or reactive mechanisms of delusional contagion supposed in FAD were not compatible with the classical concept of endogenous psychosis. However, possible psychogenic mechanisms of FAD in schizophrenia were argued by Bleuler, E and Bleuler, M. The problem of how to distinguish the endogenesis from the psychogenesis (reaction) in FAD results in an aporia well-discussed in the German-speaking psychiatry: how induction in endogeneous psychosis might be possible? In the present study, first, a case of FAD in a husband and wife both with schizophrenia was reported. Three case reports of FAD in schizophrenic married couples from Japanese literature were also examined and the concept of the mind which lies in the background of psychogenesis/endogenesis dicotomy was discussed.
A 34-year-old housewife had constructed a persecutory delusion shortly after the death of her father. She became convinced that her relative who was a Yakuza (Japanese Mafia) member was planning to kill her. She also reported auditory hallucinations. Her 41-year-old husband, who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia six years before the incident, first denied the claim of his wife that she had become a target of the Yakuza. However, shortly after that, he came to be convinced that he had become a target of another Yakuza. The couple took refuge in the husband's parents' home. Nevertheless, each of them thought that only he or she would be assassinated and not his or her spouse. After hospitalization, the husband was separated from his wife and soon recovered from his delusional state. However, the wife partially kept her persecutory delusion and full insight into her mental disorder could not be obtained after treatment. According to Gralnick's definition and sub-classifications of FAD, this case was diagnosed as FAD, subtype of "folie induite".
Observed delusions of folie à deux in schizophrenic couples were classified into the following two categories, based on the subjective pronoun of the delusional statement: 1) We-type: "We are persecuted", generally observed in cases of paranoid type schizophrenia, paranoid disorder, and shared paranoid disorder; 2) I-type: "I am persecuted", observed in cases of non-paranoid schizophrenia in particular. It could be argued that the We-type suggests the establishment of a delusional community within participants not seen in the I-type delusion. However, according to clinical observations, even in We-type delusion, subjects ignored the wills and thoughts of their partners and somehow constructed the delusional community in a somewhat one-sided and egocentric way. In both We-type and I-type delusional formation, true communication was not established because of the limitation to the solipsistic view point inherent to the subjects involved. Therefore, we designated the We-type delusional view point as Paranoid Solipsism in FAD and the I-type as Schizophrenic Solipsism in FAD. According to German traditional psychiatry, We-type Paranoid Solipsism may correspond to "psychogenic" delusional formation mechanism and I-type Schizophrenic Solipsism to "endogenous" mechanism. The structural similarity between Paranoid Solipsism and the Husserlian concept of transcendental ego was also discussed. The author suggested that classical "psychogenesis" theory in psychiatry was founded on the modern concept of mind, which is inseparable from the European philosophical tradition of self-concept by Descartes and Husserl. From the Japanese literature, the author pointed out that the majority of FAD cases in Japan took the form of possession psychosis until the 1970's, and that We-type and I-type delusional formation in FAD appeared only after the late 70's. The implication of these transformations of FAD phenomenology in accordance with social structure change was briefly discussed regarding the relationship between the modernity and FAD delusion.
自19世纪以来,许多研究报告了内源性精神病患者中的感应性精神病(FAD)。然而,精神分裂症患者中FAD的病因仍不清楚,主要是因为FAD中假设的妄想传染的可能心理成因或反应机制与内源性精神病的经典概念不相符。然而,E·布鲁勒和M·布鲁勒对精神分裂症中FAD可能的心理成因机制进行了论证。在FAD中如何区分内源性与心理成因(反应)的问题导致了德语区精神病学中一个广泛讨论的难题:内源性精神病中的诱导是如何可能的?在本研究中,首先,报告了一对均患有精神分裂症的夫妻的FAD病例。还研究了日本文献中三例精神分裂症已婚夫妇的FAD病例报告,并讨论了处于心理成因/内源性二分法背景下的心智概念。
一名34岁的家庭主妇在其父亲去世后不久产生了被害妄想。她坚信她那位身为日本黑帮成员的亲戚打算杀了她。她还报告有幻听。她41岁的丈夫在该事件发生六年前就被诊断患有精神分裂症,起初否认妻子所说的她已成为黑帮目标的说法。然而,不久之后,他开始坚信自己成了另一个黑帮的目标。这对夫妻在丈夫父母家避难。然而,他们每个人都认为只有自己会被暗杀,而配偶不会。住院后,丈夫与妻子分开,很快从妄想状态中恢复。然而,妻子部分地保留了她的被害妄想,治疗后未能完全洞察自己的精神障碍。根据格拉尼克对FAD的定义和分类,该病例被诊断为FAD,“感应性妄想症”亚型。
根据妄想陈述的主观代词,在精神分裂症夫妻中观察到的感应性精神病妄想可分为以下两类:1)“我们型”:“我们受到迫害”,通常见于偏执型精神分裂症、偏执性障碍和共享性偏执性障碍病例;2)“我型”:“我受到迫害”,尤其见于非偏执型精神分裂症病例。可以认为,“我们型”表明在参与者中建立了一个妄想群体,这在“我型”妄想中未见。然而,根据临床观察,即使在“我们型”妄想中,患者也忽视了其伴侣的意愿和想法,并且以某种片面和以自我为中心的方式构建了妄想群体。在“我们型”和“我型”妄想形成中,由于相关主体固有的唯我论观点的限制,真正的交流并未建立。因此,我们将“我们型”妄想观点指定为FAD中的偏执性唯我论,将“I型”指定为FAD中的精神分裂症唯我论。根据德国传统精神病学,“我们型”偏执性唯我论可能对应于“心理成因”妄想形成机制,“我型”精神分裂症唯我论对应于“内源性”机制。还讨论了偏执性唯我论与胡塞尔先验自我概念之间的结构相似性。作者认为,精神病学中的经典“心理成因”理论建立在现代心智概念之上,这与笛卡尔和胡塞尔的自我概念的欧洲哲学传统密不可分。作者指出,从日本文献来看,直到20世纪70年代,日本的大多数FAD病例都表现为附身精神病的形式,FAD中的“我们型”和“我型”妄想形成仅在70年代后期才出现。关于现代性与FAD妄想之间的关系,简要讨论了FAD现象学这些转变与社会结构变化的关联。