Kumazaki Tsutomu
Health Service Center Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology Tokyo Japan.
PCN Rep. 2023 Aug 8;2(3):e126. doi: 10.1002/pcn5.126. eCollection 2023 Sep.
The present article spotlights challenging conceptual and epistemological issues regarding delusions. A research history of various approaches to delusions in Europe, the United States, and Japan reveals the difficulty of defining delusions. Facing these difficulties, the standard concept of delusions has become thinner than the traditional ones, making its boundary with minority opinions vaguer. Nevertheless, clinical typology and epistemological approaches are contributing to the continuous conceptual refinement of delusions. Both standpoints validate and promote each other in elaborating the characteristics of delusions and their boundaries with non-delusions. In addition, epistemological inquiries into delusions shed new light on the extraordinarily difficult problems in the relationship among belief, knowledge, certainty, and delusions, contributing to epistemology in general. These approaches to delusions promote the evolution of the concept of delusions and related epistemological inquiries.
本文聚焦于有关妄想的具有挑战性的概念和认识论问题。欧洲、美国和日本对妄想的各种研究方法的历史揭示了定义妄想的困难。面对这些困难,妄想的标准概念变得比传统概念更单薄,使其与少数观点的界限更加模糊。然而,临床类型学和认识论方法正在促进对妄想概念的持续细化。在阐述妄想的特征及其与非妄想的界限时,这两种观点相互验证并相互促进。此外,对妄想的认识论探究为信念、知识、确定性和妄想之间关系中极其困难的问题带来了新的启示,总体上对认识论有所贡献。这些对妄想的研究方法推动了妄想概念及相关认识论探究的发展。