Morrison Lisa M
NOVA Chemicals, Inc., Moon Twp., PA 15108, USA.
J Hazard Mater. 2004 Jul 26;111(1-3):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.02.051.
This paper will summarize best practices in incident investigation in the chemical process industries and will provide examples from both the industry sector and specifically from NOVA Chemicals. As a sponsor of the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS), an industry technology alliance of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, NOVA Chemicals participates in a number of working groups to help develop best practices and tools for the chemical process and associated industries in order to advance chemical process safety. A recent project was to develop an update on guidelines for investigating chemical process incidents. A successful incident investigation management system must ensure that all incidents and near misses are reported, that root causes are identified, that recommendations from incident investigations identify appropriate preventive measures, and that these recommendations are resolved in a timely manner. The key elements of an effective management system for incident investigation will be described. Accepted definitions of such terms as near miss, incident, and root cause will be reviewed. An explanation of the types of incident classification systems in use, along with expected levels of follow-up, will be provided. There are several incident investigation methodologies in use today by members of the CCPS; most of these methodologies incorporate the use of several tools. These tools include: timelines, sequence diagrams, causal factor identification, brainstorming, checklists, pre-defined trees, and team-defined logic trees. Developing appropriate recommendations and then ensuring their resolution is the key to prevention of similar events from recurring, along with the sharing of lessons learned from incidents. There are several sources of information on previous incidents and lessons learned available to companies. In addition, many companies in the chemical process industries use their own internal databases to track recommendations from incidents and to share learnings internally.
本文将总结化工行业事故调查的最佳实践,并提供行业领域以及特别是诺瓦化学公司的实例。作为美国化学工程师学会的行业技术联盟——化工过程安全中心(CCPS)的发起方,诺瓦化学公司参与了多个工作组,以帮助为化工过程及相关行业开发最佳实践和工具,从而推进化工过程安全。最近的一个项目是对化工过程事故调查指南进行更新。一个成功的事故调查管理系统必须确保所有事故和未遂事故都得到报告,确定根本原因,事故调查的建议能确定适当的预防措施,并且这些建议能及时得到解决。将描述事故调查有效管理系统的关键要素。将回顾诸如未遂事故、事故和根本原因等术语的公认定义。将提供对正在使用的事故分类系统类型的解释,以及预期的跟进水平。目前CCPS成员使用多种事故调查方法;其中大多数方法都结合了多种工具的使用。这些工具包括:时间线、顺序图、因果因素识别、头脑风暴、检查表、预定义树和团队定义的逻辑树。制定适当的建议并确保其得到解决是防止类似事件再次发生的关键,同时还要分享从事故中吸取的教训。公司可以获取有关以往事故和经验教训的多个信息来源。此外,许多化工行业的公司使用自己的内部数据库来跟踪事故建议并在内部分享经验教训。