Suppr超能文献

度洛西汀治疗抑郁症:与帕罗西汀的双盲安慰剂对照比较。

Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: a double-blind placebo-controlled comparison with paroxetine.

作者信息

Goldstein David J, Lu Yili, Detke Michael J, Wiltse Curtis, Mallinckrodt Craig, Demitrack Mark A

机构信息

PRN Consulting, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004 Aug;24(4):389-99. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000132448.65972.d9.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Major depressive disorder causes significant morbidity and mortality. Current therapies fail to fully treat both emotional and physical symptoms of major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate duloxetine, a dual reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, on improvement of emotional and painful physical symptoms.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, evaluation of duloxetine at 40 mg/d (20 mg twice daily) and 80 mg/d (40 mg twice daily) versus placebo and paroxetine 20 mg/d in depressed outpatients.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy measure was the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Visual Analog Scales for pain, Clinical Global Impression of Severity, Patient's Global Impression of Improvement, and Quality of Life in Depression Scale were also used. Safety was evaluated by assessing discontinuation rates, adverse event rates, vital signs, and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Duloxetine 80 mg/d was superior to placebo on mean 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale total change by 3.62 points (95% CI 1.38, 5.86; P = 0.002). Duloxetine at 40 mg/d was also significantly superior to placebo by 2.43 points (95% CI 0.19, 4.66; P = 0.034), while paroxetine was not (1.51 points; 95% CI -0.55, 3.56; P = 0.150). Duloxetine 80 mg/d was superior to placebo for most other measures, including overall pain severity, and was superior to paroxetine on 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale improvement (by 2.39 points; 95% CI 0.14, 4.65; P = 0.037) and estimated probability of remission (57% for duloxetine 80 mg/d, 34% for paroxetine; P = 0.022). The only adverse event reported significantly more frequently for duloxetine 80 mg/d than for paroxetine was insomnia (19.8% for duloxetine 80 mg/d, 8.0% for paroxetine; P = 0.031). Hypertension incidence was not affected by any treatment.

CONCLUSION

Duloxetine therapy was efficacious for emotional and physical symptoms of depression, with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-like profile of side effects.

摘要

背景

重度抑郁症会导致严重的发病和死亡。目前的治疗方法无法充分治疗重度抑郁症的情绪和身体症状。

目的

评估度洛西汀(一种5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素双重再摄取抑制剂)对改善情绪和疼痛性身体症状的效果。

设计

对抑郁症门诊患者进行随机、双盲试验,评估40毫克/天(每日两次,每次20毫克)和80毫克/天(每日两次,每次40毫克)的度洛西汀与安慰剂及20毫克/天的帕罗西汀的疗效。

主要观察指标

主要疗效指标为17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表。还使用了疼痛视觉模拟量表、临床总体严重程度印象、患者总体改善印象以及抑郁量表中的生活质量量表。通过评估停药率、不良事件发生率、生命体征和实验室检查来评估安全性。

结果

度洛西汀80毫克/天在17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表总分变化上比安慰剂高出3.62分(95%置信区间1.38, 5.86;P = 0.002),具有显著优势。度洛西汀40毫克/天也比安慰剂显著高出2.43分(95%置信区间0.19, 4.66;P = 0.034),而帕罗西汀则没有(1.51分;95%置信区间 -0.55, 3.56;P = 0.150)。度洛西汀80毫克/天在包括总体疼痛严重程度在内的大多数其他指标上优于安慰剂,在17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表改善情况上比帕罗西汀高出2.39分(95%置信区间0.14, 4.65;P = 0.037),且缓解估计概率更高(度洛西汀80毫克/天为57%,帕罗西汀为34%;P = 0.022)。与帕罗西汀相比,度洛西汀80毫克/天报告的唯一更频繁出现的不良事件是失眠(度洛西汀80毫克/天为19.8%,帕罗西汀为8.0%;P = 0.031)。高血压发病率不受任何治疗的影响。

结论

度洛西汀治疗对抑郁症的情绪和身体症状有效,副作用类似选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验