Perahia D G S, Wang F, Mallinckrodt C H, Walker D J, Detke M J
Lilly Research Center, Erl Wood, Sunninghill Road, Windlesham, Surrey GU20 6PH, UK.
Eur Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;21(6):367-78. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 May 11.
Duloxetine doses of 80 and 120 mg/day were assessed for efficacy and safety in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD).
In this randomized, double-blind trial, patients age > or =18 meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD were randomized to placebo (N=99), duloxetine 80 mg/day (N=93), duloxetine 120 mg/day (N=103), or paroxetine 20 mg/day (N=97). The primary outcome measure was mean change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAMD(17)) total score after 8 weeks of treatment; a number of secondary efficacy measures also were assessed. Safety and tolerability were assessed via collection and analysis of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, and weight. The Arizona sexual experiences scale was used to assess sexual functioning. Patients who had a > or =30% reduction from baseline in the HAMD(17) total score at the end of the acute phase entered a 6-month continuation phase where they remained on the same treatment as they had taken during the acute phase; efficacy and safety/tolerability outcomes were assessed during continuation treatment.
More than 87% of patients completed the acute phase in each treatment group. Duloxetine-treated patients (both doses) showed significantly greater improvement (P<0.05) in the HAMD(17) total score at week 8 compared with placebo. Paroxetine was not significantly different from placebo (P=0.089) on mean change on the HAMD(17). Duloxetine 120 mg/day also showed significant improvement on most secondary efficacy measures (six of nine) compared with placebo while duloxetine 80 mg/day (three of nine) and paroxetine (three of nine) were significantly superior to placebo on fewer secondary measures. HAMD(17) mean change data from this study and an identical sister study were pooled as defined a priori for the purposes of performing a non-inferiority test versus paroxetine. Both duloxetine doses met statistical criteria for non-inferiority to paroxetine. TEAE reporting rates were low in all treatment groups and no deaths occurred in the acute or continuation phases.
The efficacy of duloxetine at doses of 80 and 120 mg/day in the treatment of MDD was demonstrated. Tolerability, as measured by TEAEs, and safety were similar to paroxetine 20 mg/day and consistent with previous published data on duloxetine in the treatment of MDD.
评估度洛西汀80毫克/天和120毫克/天剂量治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的疗效和安全性。
在这项随机、双盲试验中,年龄≥18岁且符合DSM-IV标准的MDD患者被随机分为安慰剂组(N = 99)、度洛西汀80毫克/天组(N = 93)、度洛西汀120毫克/天组(N = 103)或帕罗西汀20毫克/天组(N = 97)。主要疗效指标是治疗8周后17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD(17))总分相对于基线的平均变化;还评估了一些次要疗效指标。通过收集和分析治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)、生命体征和体重来评估安全性和耐受性。使用亚利桑那性体验量表评估性功能。在急性期结束时HAMD(17)总分较基线降低≥30%的患者进入为期6个月的延续期,在此期间他们继续服用急性期的相同治疗药物;在延续治疗期间评估疗效和安全性/耐受性结果。
每个治疗组中超过87%的患者完成了急性期治疗。与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀治疗的患者(两种剂量)在第8周时HAMD(17)总分有显著更大的改善(P<0.05)。帕罗西汀在HAMD(17)平均变化方面与安慰剂无显著差异(P = 0.089)。与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀120毫克/天在大多数次要疗效指标(九个中的六个)上也显示出显著改善,而度洛西汀80毫克/天(九个中的三个)和帕罗西汀(九个中的三个)在较少的次要指标上显著优于安慰剂。为了与帕罗西汀进行非劣效性检验,将本研究和一项相同的姐妹研究中HAMD(17)的平均变化数据按照预先定义进行合并。两种度洛西汀剂量均符合相对于帕罗西汀的非劣效性统计标准。所有治疗组的TEAE报告率都很低,在急性期或延续期均未发生死亡。
证明了度洛西汀80毫克/天和120毫克/天剂量治疗MDD的疗效。以TEAE衡量的耐受性和安全性与帕罗西汀20毫克/天相似,并且与先前发表的度洛西汀治疗MDD的数据一致。