Suppr超能文献

糖尿病视网膜病变和黄斑水肿的流行病学:一项系统综述

Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review.

作者信息

Williams R, Airey M, Baxter H, Forrester J, Kennedy-Martin T, Girach A

机构信息

The Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 2004 Oct;18(10):963-83. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701476.

Abstract

AIMS

To systematically review the literature on the prevalence and incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and macular oedema (MO).

METHODS

A search of the bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL) was conducted up to October 2001. Selected relevant studies were scrutinized and included in the review.

RESULTS

A total of 359 studies were included. The studies were reported in nearly 100 different journals and in over 50 countries. The majority of the studies were US-based, with large studies such as the Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy dominating the literature. The studies were quite dated and highly heterogeneous in nature in terms of patient selection with variable inclusion criteria (age range, gender, diabetes duration and type, ethnicity, comorbidity, and DR status, assessment, and classification).

CONCLUSIONS

There are inconsistencies between epidemiological studies, and differences in study methods may contribute to conflicting reports of prevalence and incidence of DR and MO in diabetic populations. As new therapies for DR and its associated complications emerge, the need to capture and monitor new epidemiological data becomes increasingly important to be able to assess the impact and effectiveness of these therapies. Robust, longitudinal capture of patient data is, therefore, essential to evaluate the impact of current practice on the epidemiology of diabetic eye complications.

摘要

目的

系统回顾有关糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和黄斑水肿(MO)患病率及发病率的文献。

方法

截至2001年10月,对文献数据库(Medline、Embase、CINAHL)进行了检索。对选定的相关研究进行了仔细审查并纳入本综述。

结果

共纳入359项研究。这些研究发表在近100种不同的期刊上,涉及50多个国家。大多数研究以美国为基础,诸如威斯康星糖尿病视网膜病变流行病学研究等大型研究主导了该文献领域。这些研究年代较为久远,在患者选择方面性质高度异质,纳入标准各不相同(年龄范围、性别、糖尿病病程和类型、种族、合并症以及DR状态、评估和分类)。

结论

流行病学研究之间存在不一致之处,研究方法的差异可能导致糖尿病患者中DR和MO患病率及发病率的报告相互矛盾。随着DR及其相关并发症新疗法的出现,获取和监测新的流行病学数据对于评估这些疗法的影响和效果变得越来越重要。因此,对患者数据进行强有力的纵向收集对于评估当前实践对糖尿病眼部并发症流行病学的影响至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验