Suppr超能文献

中心静脉导管相关血流感染:发病率、危险因素、结局及相关病原体。

Central venous catheter-related blood stream infections: incidence, risk factors, outcome, and associated pathogens.

作者信息

Pawar Mandakini, Mehta Yatin, Kapoor Pawan, Sharma Jitendra, Gupta Abhinav, Trehan Naresh

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Jun;18(3):304-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.03.009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence, risk factors, outcome, and pathogens of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections (CVC-BSIs).

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Escorts Heart Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand three hundred fourteen consecutive patients undergoing cardiac operations who were admitted to the intensive care unit with CVC.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients were assigned into CVC-BSI (n = 35) and non-CVC-BSI (n = 1,279) groups.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 1,314 patients in the study, 35 (2.6%) had CVC-BSI. On univariate analysis, significant risk factors were use of multilumen catheters, coexistent infections, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC), total ventilation hours, emergency surgery, acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation score (APACHE II), and steroids. On multivariate analysis, duration of catheterization (24.5 +/- 10.9 v 6.1 +/- 3.2; p < 0.001), coexistent infections (57.11% v 2.61%; p < 0.001), IABC (77.1% v 4.1%; p = 0.005), and temperature (38.2 +/- 0.6 v 37.4 +/- 0.3; p < 0.001) were independent predictors of CVC-BSI. Pathogens isolated were Escherichia coli (47%), Acinetobacter species (11.7%), Enterobacter species (5.8%), Proteus species (5.8%), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus species (11.7%), coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species (5.8%), and Candida (11.7%). The mortality rate in CVC-BSI was 22.9% as compared with 0.2% in non-CVC-BSI cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

By univariate analysis, the risk factors for CVC-BSI were use of multilumen catheters, duration of catheterization, total ventilation hours, IABC, emergency surgery, APACHE II score, coexistent infections, and steroids. On multivariate analysis, duration of catheterization, IABC, coexistent infections, and temperature were independent predictors of CVC-BSI. The mortality was increased with CVC-BSI.

摘要

目的

确定中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CVC-BSIs)的发生率、危险因素、结局及病原体。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

印度新德里 Escorts 心脏研究所及研究中心。

参与者

1314 例连续接受心脏手术且入住重症监护病房并留置中心静脉导管的患者。

干预措施

所有患者被分为 CVC-BSI 组(n = 35)和非 CVC-BSI 组(n = 1279)。

测量指标及主要结果

在 1314 例研究患者中,35 例(2.6%)发生 CVC-BSI。单因素分析显示,显著的危险因素包括多腔导管的使用、合并感染、主动脉内球囊反搏(IABC)、总通气时长、急诊手术、急性生理学、年龄、慢性健康评估评分(APACHE II)及类固醇。多因素分析表明,置管时间(24.5±10.9 对 6.1±3.2;p < 0.001)、合并感染(57.11%对 2.61%;p < 0.001)、IABC(77.1%对 4.1%;p = 0.005)及体温(38.2±0.6 对 37.4±0.3;p < 0.001)是 CVC-BSI 的独立预测因素。分离出的病原体有大肠杆菌(47%)、不动杆菌属(11.7%)、肠杆菌属(5.8%)、变形杆菌属(5.8%)、耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌属(11.7%)、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌属(5.8%)及念珠菌(11.7%)。CVC-BSI 患者的死亡率为 22.9%,而非 CVC-BSI 患者为 0.2%(p < 0.001)。

结论

单因素分析显示,CVC-BSI 的危险因素包括多腔导管的使用、置管时间、总通气时长、IABC、急诊手术、APACHE II 评分、合并感染及类固醇。多因素分析表明,置管时间、IABC、合并感染及体温是 CVC-BSI 的独立预测因素。CVC-BSI 会增加死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验