Bartusseck E, Fatehi S, Motsch J, Grau T
Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg.
Anaesthesist. 2004 Sep;53(9):836-46. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0704-2.
The practice of regional anaesthesia in German speaking countries was investigated by a survey. The first part of the trilogy contains the presentation and evaluation of the data about quality assurance and training concepts. In 2002 questionnaires were mailed to 750 randomly selected departments of anaesthesia and 384 hospitals participated (51.2%). The overall proportion of regional anaesthesia was 23% and in Switzerland it was significantly higher (adults: 48%; children: 31%). Of the hospitals 19% had no person who was responsible for quality assurance. The number of puncture attempts was unlimited in 59% of the hospitals. The first training steps were observed closely (complete observation: 81%). The exact beginning (48%) and end (15%/13%) of the training were often not fixed, 80% of all anaesthesia departments requested an improvement in the training for peripheral and 53% for neuroaxial regional anaesthesia techniques. Regional anaesthesia plays a highly important role. Concepts of training and quality assurance that are backed up by evidence-based medicine should be worked out to improve the training and further education in regional anaesthesia.
通过一项调查对德语国家的区域麻醉实践进行了研究。该三部曲的第一部分包含了关于质量保证和培训概念的数据呈现与评估。2002年,向750个随机选取的麻醉科邮寄了调查问卷,384家医院参与了调查(参与率为51.2%)。区域麻醉的总体比例为23%,在瑞士显著更高(成人:48%;儿童:31%)。19%的医院没有负责质量保证的人员。59%的医院穿刺尝试次数没有限制。对培训的最初步骤观察密切(完全观察:81%)。培训的确切开始时间(48%)和结束时间(15%/13%)往往没有确定,所有麻醉科中80%要求改进外周区域麻醉技术的培训,53%要求改进神经轴区域麻醉技术的培训。区域麻醉起着非常重要的作用。应制定以循证医学为依据的培训和质量保证概念,以改善区域麻醉的培训和继续教育。