Suppr超能文献

污水处理厂中的有机磷酸酯阻燃剂和增塑剂。

Organophosphate flame retardants and plasticisers in wastewater treatment plants.

作者信息

Meyer J, Bester K

机构信息

Waste- and Wastewater Management, Department 10, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 15, 45141 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Environ Monit. 2004 Jul;6(7):599-605. doi: 10.1039/b403206c. Epub 2004 May 24.

Abstract

Previous studies have revealed that chlorinated and non-chlorinated organophosphorous flame retardants and plasticisers are important contaminants in German surface waters and it has been demonstrated that wastewater treatment plants contribute to the emission of these substances. In this study temporal development as well as elimination efficiency were determined in two wastewater treatment plants (STP) in the Ruhr/Rhine area at different stages of the wastewater treatment process. The samples were analysed for the non-chlorinated organophosphate esters tri-n-butylphosphate (TnBP), tri-iso-butylphosphate (TiBP), tris-(butoxyethyl)-phosphate (TBEP) and triphenylphosphate (TPP) and the chlorinated organophosphate esters tris-(2-chloro, 1-methylethyl)-phosphate (TCPP), tris-(2-chloro-, 1-chloromethylethyl)-phosphate (TDCP) and tris-(2-chloroethyl)-phosphate (TCEP). The study showed that there were significant differences in the elimination of chlorinated and non-chlorinated organophosphorous flame retardants. The elimination rates ranged from 57-86% for TiBP, TnBP and TBEP at both STP's. No elimination of the chlorinated flame retardants TCPP, TDCP and TCEP was observed in any of the sampled STPs. At both STPs the first treatment steps and the final filtration did not contribute to the elimination of the non-chlorinated organophosphorous flame retardants while the aeration step did. At both STPs the efficiency of the cleaning process concerning the flame retardants was comparable. Thus the type of construction of the STP was not relevant for the elimination of these substances. Additionally a strong day-to-day variation was observed, while in one STP a temporal trend for TCPP during the week was found.

摘要

先前的研究表明,氯化和非氯化有机磷阻燃剂及增塑剂是德国地表水中的重要污染物,并且已经证明污水处理厂会排放这些物质。在本研究中,对鲁尔/莱茵地区两家污水处理厂(STP)在污水处理过程不同阶段的时间变化以及去除效率进行了测定。对样品分析了非氯化有机磷酸酯磷酸三丁酯(TnBP)、磷酸三异丁酯(TiBP)、磷酸三(丁氧基乙基)酯(TBEP)和磷酸三苯酯(TPP)以及氯化有机磷酸酯磷酸三(2-氯-1-甲基乙基)酯(TCPP)、磷酸三(2-氯-1-氯甲基乙基)酯(TDCP)和磷酸三(2-氯乙基)酯(TCEP)。研究表明,氯化和非氯化有机磷阻燃剂的去除存在显著差异。两家污水处理厂中TiBP、TnBP和TBEP的去除率在57%至86%之间。在所采样的任何一家污水处理厂中均未观察到氯化阻燃剂TCPP、TDCP和TCEP的去除。在两家污水处理厂中,第一步处理和最终过滤对非氯化有机磷阻燃剂的去除没有作用,而曝气步骤有作用。在两家污水处理厂中,关于阻燃剂的清洁过程效率相当。因此,污水处理厂的建设类型与这些物质的去除无关。此外,观察到了强烈的每日变化,同时在一家污水处理厂中发现了一周内TCPP的时间趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验