Oestman E, Schweitzer L, Tomboulian P, Corado A, Suffet I H
Department of Chemistry, Oakland University, Rochester, MI 48309, USA.
Water Sci Technol. 2004;49(9):153-9.
Water treatment plants in the US may operate under the assumption that chlorine masks earthy and musty odors from geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol (MIB) in drinking water. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the effects of chlorine and chloramines on geosmin and MIB by two sensory analysis approaches--a statistical Pairwise Comparison Test, and Flavor Profile Analysis (FPA). All Pairwise Ranking test statistics were significant (p<0.05); we conclude that panelists can differentiate minor differences in geosmin and MIB concentrations in a Pairwise Comparison Test even in the presence of chlorine. FPA appeared to be more challenging in discerning subtle differences in concentrations of geosmin or MIB than did the Pairwise Comparison Test, and the presence of chlorine (0.5-20 mg/L) and chloramines (3-24 mg/L) confused the panelists (i.e showed a larger error in the intensity of response reported by the panel), but did not necessarily mask geosmin or MIB.
氯能掩盖饮用水中来自土臭素和2-甲基异冰片(MIB)的土腥味和霉味。为了验证这一假设,我们通过两种感官分析方法——统计成对比较测试和风味剖析分析(FPA),评估了氯和氯胺对土臭素和MIB的影响。所有成对排序测试统计数据均具有显著性(p<0.05);我们得出结论,即使在有氯的情况下,评审员在成对比较测试中也能区分出土臭素和MIB浓度的细微差异。与成对比较测试相比,风味剖析分析在辨别土臭素或MIB浓度的细微差异方面似乎更具挑战性,并且氯(0.5-20毫克/升)和氯胺(3-24毫克/升)的存在使评审员感到困惑(即评审员报告的反应强度误差更大),但不一定能掩盖土臭素或MIB。