Suppr超能文献

为何独特信息能减少错误记忆:关于关系编码不足和独特性启发式解释的证据

Why distinctive information reduces false memories: evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts.

作者信息

Hege Amanda C G, Dodson Chad S

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, 102 Gilmer Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jul;30(4):787-95. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.787.

Abstract

Two accounts explain why studying pictures reduces false memories within the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm (J. Deese, 1959; H. L. Roediger & K. B. McDermott, 1995). The impoverished relational-encoding account suggests that studying pictures interferes with the encoding of relational information, which is the primary basis for false memories in this paradigm. Alternatively, the distinctiveness heuristic assumes that critical lures are actively withheld by the use of a retrieval strategy. When participants were given inclusion recall instructions to report studied items as well as related items, they still reported critical lures less often after picture encoding than they did after word encoding. As the impoverished relational-encoding account suggests, critical lures appear less likely to come to mind after picture encoding than they do after word encoding. However, the results from a postrecall recognition test provide evidence in favor of the distinctiveness heuristic.

摘要

有两种观点解释了为什么在迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式(J. 迪斯,1959年;H. L. 罗迪格和K. B. 麦克德莫特,1995年)中研究图片会减少错误记忆。贫乏关系编码观点认为,研究图片会干扰关系信息的编码,而关系信息是该范式中错误记忆的主要基础。另外,独特性启发式假设通过使用检索策略可以有效地抑制关键诱饵。当参与者被给予包含性回忆指令以报告所学项目以及相关项目时,与单词编码后相比,他们在图片编码后报告关键诱饵的频率仍然更低。正如贫乏关系编码观点所表明的那样,与单词编码后相比,关键诱饵在图片编码后似乎不太可能出现在脑海中。然而,回忆后识别测试的结果提供了支持独特性启发式的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验