• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印象形成中特质中心性的推理成本:记忆中的组织与错误记忆

Inferential Costs of Trait Centrality in Impression Formation: Organization in Memory and Misremembering.

作者信息

Nunes Ludmila D, Garcia-Marques Leonel, Ferreira Mário B, Ramos Tânia

机构信息

Center for Instructional Excellence, Purdue UniversityLafayette, IN, United States.

Centro de Investigação em Ciência Psicológica (CICPSI), Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de LisboaLisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01408. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01408
PMID:28878708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5572275/
Abstract

An extension of the DRM paradigm was used to study the impact of central traits (Asch, 1946) in impression formation. Traits corresponding to the four clusters of the implicit theory of personality-intellectual, positive and negative; and social, positive and negative (Rosenberg et al., 1968)-were used to develop lists containing several traits of one cluster and one central trait prototypical of the opposite cluster. Participants engaging in impression formation relative to participants engaging in memorization not only produced higher levels of false memories corresponding to the same cluster of the list traits but, under response time pressure at retrieval, also produced more false memories of the cluster corresponding to the central trait. We argue that the importance of central traits stems from their ability to activate their corresponding semantic space within a specialized associative memory structure underlying the implicit theory of personality.

摘要

DRM范式的一种扩展被用于研究核心特质(阿施,1946年)在印象形成中的影响。与人格内隐理论的四个类别相对应的特质——智力方面,积极和消极的;社交方面,积极和消极的(罗森伯格等人,1968年)——被用于编制列表,这些列表包含一个类别的几个特质以及相反类别的一个核心特质原型。与参与记忆的参与者相比,参与印象形成的参与者不仅产生了与列表特质同一类别的更高水平的错误记忆,而且在检索时的反应时间压力下,还产生了更多与核心特质相对应类别的错误记忆。我们认为,核心特质的重要性源于它们能够在人格内隐理论所基于的专门联想记忆结构中激活其相应的语义空间。

相似文献

1
Inferential Costs of Trait Centrality in Impression Formation: Organization in Memory and Misremembering.印象形成中特质中心性的推理成本:记忆中的组织与错误记忆
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 22;8:1408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01408. eCollection 2017.
2
The Trajectory of Targets and Critical Lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: A Systematic Review.迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式中目标与关键诱饵的轨迹:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:718818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718818. eCollection 2021.
3
The effect of early list manipulations on the DRM illusion.早期列表操作对 DRM 错觉的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 Nov;74(11):1924-1934. doi: 10.1177/17470218211012620. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
4
False memories and the DRM paradigm: effects of imagery, list, and test type.错误记忆与DRM范式:意象、列表及测试类型的影响
J Gen Psychol. 2016;143(1):33-48. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2015.1110558.
5
True and False DRM Memories: Differences Detected with an Implicit Task.真实与虚假的 DRM 记忆:通过一项内隐任务检测到的差异
Front Psychol. 2012 Aug 27;3:310. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00310. eCollection 2012.
6
Semantic processes leading to true and false memory formation in schizophrenia.导致精神分裂症真、假记忆形成的语义加工。
Schizophr Res. 2013 Jul;147(2-3):320-5. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
7
Semantic and episodic processes differently predict false memories in the DRM task.语义和情节过程以不同的方式预测 DRM 任务中的错误记忆。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 2;14(1):256. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-50687-z.
8
Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children.基于儿童片段完成测试的Deese-Roediger-McDermott列表引发的启动效应和错误记忆
Am J Psychol. 2005 Spring;118(1):13-28.
9
Measuring the activation level of critical lures in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm.在迪ese-罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式中测量关键诱饵的激活水平。
Am J Psychol. 2003 Spring;116(1):1-14.
10
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)任务:一种在实验室中研究错误记忆的简单认知范式。
J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 31(119):54793. doi: 10.3791/54793.

本文引用的文献

1
A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad.相似性中的一种普遍效价不对称:好的比坏的更相似。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1171-92. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000243. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
2
Halo Effects in Trait Assessment Depend on Information Valence: Why Being Honest Makes You Industrious, but Lying Does Not Make You Lazy.特质评估中的光环效应取决于信息效价:为何诚实会让你显得勤奋,而说谎却不会让你显得懒惰。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2016 Mar;42(3):290-310. doi: 10.1177/0146167215627137. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
3
A density explanation of valence asymmetries in recognition memory.识别记忆中效价不对称性的密度解释。
Mem Cognit. 2015 Aug;43(6):896-909. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0515-5.
4
The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.独特性的微妙之处:冯·雷斯托夫真正做了什么。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):105-12. doi: 10.3758/BF03214414.
5
Attitudes and cognitive organization.态度与认知组织。
J Psychol. 1946 Jan;21:107-12. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275.
6
Forming impressions of personality.形成对个性的印象。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1946 Jul;41:258-90. doi: 10.1037/h0055756.
7
False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.虚假记忆与奇幻信念: DRM 错觉的 15 年。
Mem Cognit. 2010 Oct;38(7):833-48. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833.
8
Compensation versus halo: the unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment.补偿与光环效应:社会判断基本维度之间的独特关系
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Aug;34(8):1110-23. doi: 10.1177/0146167208318602.
9
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
10
A contextual interference account of distinctiveness effects in recognition.识别中独特性效应的情境干扰解释。
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jun;34(4):743-51. doi: 10.3758/bf03193422.