Suppr超能文献

用于识别心血管药物治疗依从性不佳的自我报告的莫利斯基评分。

Self-reported Morisky score for identifying nonadherence with cardiovascular medications.

作者信息

Shalansky Stephen J, Levy Adrian R, Ignaszewski Andrew P

机构信息

Pharmacy Department, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;38(9):1363-8. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E071. Epub 2004 Jul 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Morisky medication adherence scale is a commonly used adherence screening tool. It is composed of 4 yes/no questions about past medication use patterns and is thus quick and simple to use during drug history interviews.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of the self-reported Morisky score as a screening tool for identifying patients who have been nonadherent with chronic cardiovascular medications.

METHODS

Patients who had taken an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or lipid-lowering agent for at least 3 consecutive months were interviewed using a structured questionnaire including the Morisky scale. Nonadherence was defined as taking < 80% of chronic cardiovascular medications based on prescription refill data over the previous 14 months.

RESULTS

Forty-nine of 377 (13%) patients were categorized as nonadherent; however, only 12 (3%) patients had Morisky scores suggesting a high likelihood of nonadherence (3 or 4). While the Morisky score was a significant independent predictor of nonadherence by multivariate analysis, there was no threshold score or individual question that yielded concurrent high sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) for identifying nonadherent patients. The internal consistency of the questions was low (alpha 0.32), as were item-to-total score correlations, suggesting that the individual questions were not measuring the same attribute.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the Morisky scale to identify patients who have been nonadherent with chronic cardiovascular medications may be reasonable in some settings; however, the threshold score would have to be chosen based on a trade-off between sensitivity and PPV. These results were likely influenced by the low rate of nonadherence in this cohort. Rewording the questions, increasing the number of questions, and the use of graded response options may improve consistency.

摘要

背景

莫利斯基药物依从性量表是一种常用的依从性筛查工具。它由4个关于过去用药模式的是/否问题组成,因此在药物史访谈中使用快速简便。

目的

评估自我报告的莫利斯基评分作为识别慢性心血管药物治疗不依从患者的筛查工具的效用。

方法

对连续服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或降脂药物至少3个月的患者,使用包含莫利斯基量表的结构化问卷进行访谈。根据前14个月的处方 refill 数据,将不依从定义为服用的慢性心血管药物少于规定剂量的80%。

结果

377例患者中有49例(13%)被归类为不依从;然而,只有12例(3%)患者的莫利斯基评分表明不依从可能性高(3分或4分)。虽然多因素分析显示莫利斯基评分是不依从的显著独立预测因素,但没有阈值分数或单个问题能同时产生高敏感性和阳性预测值(PPV)以识别不依从患者。问题的内部一致性较低(α 0.32),各项目与总分的相关性也较低,表明单个问题测量的并非同一属性。

结论

在某些情况下,使用莫利斯基量表识别慢性心血管药物治疗不依从患者可能是合理的;然而,阈值分数必须根据敏感性和PPV之间的权衡来选择。这些结果可能受到该队列中不依从率较低的影响。重新措辞问题、增加问题数量以及使用分级回答选项可能会提高一致性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验