Sakthong Phantipa, Chabunthom Rossamalin, Charoenvisuthiwongs Rungpetch
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):950-7. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L453. Epub 2009 Apr 14.
A self-reporting questionnaire is the most convenient and cheapest way to assess medication adherence. A new 8-item self-reported Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) has been developed and has shown better psychometric properties than the original 4-item Morisky scale.
To examine the validity, including convergent known-groups and construct validity, and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, of the MMAS in Thai patients with type 2 diabetes.
The data were derived from a cross-sectional study. In a convenience sample, 303 type 2 diabetic outpatients were interviewed at the General Police Hospital in Bangkok, Thailand, between January and June 2007. Face-to-face interviews included MMAS, medication adherence visual analog scale (MA-VAS), and sociodemographic data. Medical records were reviewed for clinical data such as hemoglobin A(1C) (A1C) levels.
Internal consistency reliability was moderate (Cronbach's alpha = 0.61), whereas the test-retest reliability of the MMAS was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.83; p < 0.001). Concerning convergent validity, the MMAS had a high correlation with the 3-item Morisky scale (r = 0.77; p < 0.01) and a medium correlation with the MA-VAS (r = 0.57; p < 0.01). Regarding known-groups validity, a significant association between MMAS and A1C levels was found (chi(2) = 6.7; p < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the MMAS were 51%, 64%, 71%, and 43%, respectively. Our factor analysis showed that the MMAS had 3 dimensions including forgetting to take medications, stopping medications when feeling better or worse, and the complexity of the drug regimen.
The 8-item MMAS can be a tool to aid in assessing medication adherence in diabetes. The poor sensitivity can be improved by increasing the number of the response choices and the cut-off score of the scale and by using specific words in some items. A modified Thai version of the 8-item MMAS may be needed.
自我报告问卷是评估药物依从性最便捷、最便宜的方法。一种新的8项自我报告的莫里isky药物依从性量表(MMAS)已被开发出来,并且显示出比原始的4项莫里isky量表更好的心理测量特性。
检验MMAS在泰国2型糖尿病患者中的效度,包括收敛效度(已知组效度和结构效度)和信度,包括内部一致性和重测信度。
数据来源于一项横断面研究。在一个便利样本中,2007年1月至6月期间,在泰国曼谷警察总医院对303名2型糖尿病门诊患者进行了访谈。面对面访谈包括MMAS、药物依从性视觉模拟量表(MA-VAS)和社会人口统计学数据。查阅病历以获取血红蛋白A(1C)(A1C)水平等临床数据。
内部一致性信度中等(Cronbach's α = 0.61),而MMAS的重测信度极佳(组内相关系数 = 0.83;p < 0.001)。关于收敛效度,MMAS与3项莫里isky量表高度相关(r = 0.77;p < 0.01),与MA-VAS中度相关(r = 0.57;p < 0.01)。关于已知组效度,发现MMAS与A1C水平之间存在显著关联(χ² = 6.7;p < 0.05)。MMAS的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为51%、64%、71%和43%。我们的因子分析表明,MMAS有3个维度,包括忘记服药、感觉好转或恶化时停药以及药物治疗方案的复杂性。
8项MMAS可以作为辅助评估糖尿病患者药物依从性的工具。通过增加反应选项的数量和量表的截断分数,并在某些项目中使用特定词汇,可以提高较差的敏感性。可能需要一个经过修改的泰语版8项MMAS。