Aksornmuang Juthatip, Foxton Richard M, Nakajima Masatoshi, Tagami Junji
Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative Science, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Graduate School, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8549, Japan.
J Dent. 2004 Aug;32(6):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.03.001.
To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (microTBS) of a dual-cure resin core material to different regions of fibre posts using different surface treatments.
Twenty-five silica zirconium glass fibre posts (Snowpost) and 25 quartz fibre posts (Aestheti-Plus) were used and randomly divided into five groups according to the surface treatments: (1) no surface treatment (Control) (2) dual-cure bonding agent, Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (LB) (3) LB followed by light curing for 20 s (LB and C) (4) silane coupling bonding agent agent, Clearfil Photobond with Porcelain Bond Activator (PB+PBA) (5) PB+PBA followed by light curing for 20 s (PB+PBA and LC). Treated posts were cemented into artificial post cavities using a dual-cure composite core material (Clearfil DC Core) and cured for 60 s from the top of the cavity. After 24 h storage in water, each specimen was serially sliced into 8, 0.6 x 0.6 mm2-thick beams for the microTBS test. The data were divided into three regions (upper/middle/bottom) and analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Dunnet's T3 multiple comparisons (alpha=0.05).
There were no significant differences in bond strength between the three regions (p>0.05). The bond strengths were enhanced by the application of a silane coupling agent. For Snowpost, photoirradiation of the dual-cure bonding agent applied to the post surface significantly improved the bond strength (p<0.05) whereas it did not affect the bond strength of Aestheti-Plus post (p>0.05).
The bond strength between fibre post and dual-cure resin core material depends upon the type of post and surface treatment. There were no regional differences in microTBS of the bonded post.
评估双固化树脂核材料与不同表面处理的纤维桩不同区域之间的微拉伸粘结强度(microTBS)。
使用25根氧化锆硅玻璃纤维桩(Snowpost)和25根石英纤维桩(Aestheti-Plus),并根据表面处理随机分为五组:(1)未进行表面处理(对照组)(2)双固化粘结剂,Clearfil Liner Bond 2V(LB)(3)LB后进行20秒光固化(LB和C)(4)硅烷偶联粘结剂,含瓷粘结活化剂的Clearfil Photobond(PB + PBA)(5)PB + PBA后进行20秒光固化(PB + PBA和LC)。使用双固化复合树脂核材料(Clearfil DC Core)将处理后的桩粘结到人工桩腔中,并从腔顶部固化60秒。在水中储存24小时后,将每个标本连续切成8根0.6×0.6平方毫米厚的梁进行微拉伸粘结强度测试。数据分为三个区域(上部/中部/底部),并使用三因素方差分析和Dunnet's T3多重比较进行分析(α = 0.05)。
三个区域之间的粘结强度无显著差异(p>0.05)。硅烷偶联剂的应用提高了粘结强度。对于Snowpost,应用于桩表面的双固化粘结剂的光照射显著提高了粘结强度(p<0.05),而对Aestheti-Plus桩的粘结强度没有影响(p>0.05)。
纤维桩与双固化树脂核材料之间的粘结强度取决于桩的类型和表面处理。粘结桩的微拉伸粘结强度不存在区域差异。