Sommer Iris E C, Aleman André, Bouma Anke, Kahn René S
Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brain. 2004 Aug;127(Pt 8):1845-52. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh207. Epub 2004 Jul 7.
Sex differences in cognition are consistently reported, men excelling in most visuospatial tasks and women in certain verbal tasks. It has been hypothesized that these sex differences in cognition results from a more bilateral pattern of language representation in women than in men. This bilateral pattern of language representation in women is thought to interfere with visuospatial functions in the right hemisphere. To test whether language representation is indeed more bilateral in the female than in the male brain, a meta-analysis was performed on studies that assessed language activity with functional imaging in healthy men and women. Effect sizes were weighted for sample size and the meta-analytic method was applied to obtain a combined effect size. Fourteen studies were included, providing data on 377 men and 442 women. Meta-analysis yielded a mean weighted effect d of 0.21 with a 95% confidence interval of -0.05 to 0.48, indicating no significant difference in language lateralization between men and women. This implies that the putative sex difference in language lateralization may be absent at the population level, or may be observed only with some, as yet not defined, language tasks. It is therefore not likely that differences in language lateralization underlie the general sex differences in cognitive performance, and the neuronal basis for these cognitive sex differences remains elusive.
认知方面的性别差异一直都有报道,男性在大多数视觉空间任务中表现出色,而女性在某些语言任务中表现出色。据推测,这些认知方面的性别差异是由于女性比男性的语言表征模式更具双侧性。女性这种双侧性的语言表征模式被认为会干扰右半球的视觉空间功能。为了测试女性大脑中的语言表征是否确实比男性更具双侧性,对那些用功能成像评估健康男性和女性语言活动的研究进行了一项荟萃分析。效应量根据样本量进行加权,并应用荟萃分析方法来获得合并效应量。纳入了14项研究,提供了377名男性和442名女性的数据。荟萃分析得出平均加权效应d为0.21,95%置信区间为-0.05至0.48,表明男性和女性在语言侧化方面没有显著差异。这意味着在总体水平上可能不存在假定的语言侧化性别差异,或者可能仅在某些尚未明确的语言任务中才能观察到。因此,语言侧化的差异不太可能是认知表现中一般性别的差异的基础,而这些认知性别差异的神经基础仍然难以捉摸。