Boyadzhyan B, Yashina T, Yatabe J H, Patnaik M, Hill C S
Specialty Laboratories, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jul;42(7):3089-93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.7.3089-3093.2004.
The Gen-Probe APTIMA Combo 2 (AC2) is a Food and Drug Administration-cleared nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae from urine and urogenital swab specimens. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have recommended confirmation of positive NAAT results in low-prevalence populations. APTIMA CT (ACT) and APTIMA GC (AGC) are two discrete NAATs for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae detection that are suitable for confirming AC2-positive results because they target different nucleic acid sequences. Our objective was to determine if ACT and AGC could be used as confirmatory tests for AC2 and to correlate the APTIMA assays with culture, direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA), and LCx CT and GC assays. Urine and swab specimens (1,304) were initially tested with either culture, DFA, or LCx, followed by AC2. A subset (675) was then tested with ACT and AGC. There was absolute concordance between ACT-AGC and AC2. LCx did not detect 1 of 14 AC2-ACT- and 1 of 6 AC2-AGC-positive urine samples, and it yielded one C. trachomatis- and one N. gonorrhoeae-positive swab result that were not detected by AC2 and ACT-AGC. Culture failed to detect 5 of 20 AC2-ACT and 3 of 4 AC2-AGC positives, and DFA missed 4 of 4 AC2-ACT positives. Thus, ACT and AGC relative sensitivity compared to that of AC2 was 100%. All APTIMA assays detected more confirmed positive results than culture, DFA, and LCx. The performance of APTIMA assays was not altered by the use of various swab types and by long-term storage of specimens. All APTIMA assays are highly sensitive and rapid. ACT and AGC can be recommended for confirmation of positive results from other NAATs, such as AC2 and LCx.
基因探针公司的APTIMA组合2(AC2)是一种经美国食品药品监督管理局批准的核酸扩增检测(NAAT)方法,用于从尿液和泌尿生殖系统拭子标本中检测沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌。美国疾病控制与预防中心建议在低流行人群中对NAAT检测呈阳性的结果进行确认。APTIMA CT(ACT)和APTIMA GC(AGC)是两种分别用于检测沙眼衣原体和淋病奈瑟菌的NAAT方法,由于它们针对不同的核酸序列,适用于确认AC2检测呈阳性的结果。我们的目的是确定ACT和AGC是否可用作AC2的确认试验,并将APTIMA检测方法与培养法、直接荧光抗体(DFA)法以及LCx CT和GC检测方法进行对比。对1304份尿液和拭子标本首先采用培养法、DFA法或LCx法进行检测,随后采用AC2进行检测。然后对其中675份标本采用ACT和AGC进行检测。ACT-AGC与AC2之间完全一致。LCx未检测出14份AC2-ACT阳性尿液样本中的1份以及6份AC2-AGC阳性尿液样本中的1份,并且它得出了1份沙眼衣原体阳性和1份淋病奈瑟菌阳性的拭子检测结果,而AC2以及ACT-AGC均未检测出该结果。培养法未检测出20份AC2-ACT阳性样本中的5份以及4份AC2-AGC阳性样本中的3份,DFA法未检测出4份AC2-ACT阳性样本中的4份。因此,与AC2相比,ACT和AGC的相对灵敏度为100%。所有APTIMA检测方法检测出的确诊阳性结果均多于培养法、DFA法和LCx法。使用各种类型的拭子以及标本的长期保存均未改变APTIMA检测方法的性能。所有APTIMA检测方法均具有高度灵敏性且检测速度快。可以推荐使用ACT和AGC来确认其他NAAT检测方法(如AC2和LCx)得出的阳性结果。