Suppr超能文献

强迫症亚型的批判性评估:症状与机制

A critical evaluation of obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes: symptoms versus mechanisms.

作者信息

McKay Dean, Abramowitz Jonathan S, Calamari John E, Kyrios Michael, Radomsky Adam, Sookman Debbie, Taylor Steven, Wilhelm Sabine

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Fordham University, 441 East Fordham Road, Bronx, NY 10458-5198, USA.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Rev. 2004 Jul;24(3):283-313. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.04.003.

Abstract

Recently, experts have suggested that obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a highly heterogeneous condition, is actually composed of distinct subtypes. Research to identify specific subtypes of OCD has focused primarily on symptom presentation. Subtype models have been proposed using factor analyses that yield dimensional systems of symptom categories, but not necessarily distinct subtypes. Other empirical work has considered the role of neuropsychological functioning and comorbidity as part of a comprehensive scheme for subtyping OCD. The identified dimensions from all of these studies have implications for the treatment of OCD. In this article, we review the research on subtypes of OCD, focusing on subtype schemes based upon overt symptom presentation and neuropsychological profiles. We also review research pertinent to alternative subtyping schemes, both conceptually and methodologically. The research is critically examined and implications for treatment are discussed. Recommendations for future investigations are offered.

摘要

最近,专家们指出,强迫症(OCD)是一种高度异质性的疾病,实际上由不同的亚型组成。识别强迫症特定亚型的研究主要集中在症状表现上。已提出使用因子分析的亚型模型,该模型产生症状类别的维度系统,但不一定是不同的亚型。其他实证研究将神经心理功能和共病的作用视为强迫症亚型分类综合方案的一部分。所有这些研究中确定的维度对强迫症的治疗具有启示意义。在本文中,我们回顾了关于强迫症亚型的研究,重点关注基于明显症状表现和神经心理特征的亚型方案。我们还从概念和方法上回顾了与替代亚型分类方案相关的研究。对该研究进行了批判性审视,并讨论了其对治疗的启示。提供了对未来研究的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验