Hinuma Saki, Ogishima Hiroyoshi, Shimada Hironori, Tanaka Yuki, Osao Masumi, Moriishi Chihiro, Obata Shugo
Department of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Health and Welfare Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Information Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Nara, Japan.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 20;16:1520496. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1520496. eCollection 2025.
Intrusive thoughts occurring independently of intention are symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorders (OCD). However, they also appear in various other disorders, including substance use disorders, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and anxiety disorders, as well as in healthy individuals. Despite this, the diversity of intrusive thoughts remains largely unexplored. In this study, we aimed to (1) classify the factors causing intrusive thoughts as identified in previous research and (2) elucidate differences in the psychological states of intrusive thoughts.
We investigated 298 participants over 20 years old using a questionnaire that includes scales such as "obsessive-compulsive belief," "stress responses," "thought suppression," and "evaluation of intrusive thoughts." To analyze data, we applied co-clustering, a machine-learning technique, to the data obtained from the investigation.
We identified three factors that affect the occurrence of intrusive thoughts: "Negative Evaluation of Intrusive Thoughts," "Stress Responses," and "Excessive Control of Intrusive Thoughts." Furthermore, based on the scoring patterns of these three factors, participants were classified into five subtypes characterized by their degree of OCD tendencies. Further analysis revealed that the three factors could not be explained by OCD tendencies. Additionally, it was found that the five subtypes employed different coping strategies.
These findings suggest that intrusive thoughts cannot be fully explained solely by the degree of OCD tendencies, which could provide valuable insights into cognitive-behavioral support targeting the various psychological states associated with intrusive thoughts.
独立于意图而出现的侵入性思维是强迫症(OCD)的症状。然而,它们也出现在各种其他疾病中,包括物质使用障碍、抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍和焦虑症,以及健康个体中。尽管如此,侵入性思维的多样性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。在本研究中,我们旨在(1)对先前研究中确定的导致侵入性思维的因素进行分类,以及(2)阐明侵入性思维心理状态的差异。
我们使用一份包含“强迫信念”、“应激反应”、“思维抑制”和“对侵入性思维的评估”等量表的问卷,对298名20岁以上的参与者进行了调查。为了分析数据,我们将一种机器学习技术——协同聚类应用于从调查中获得的数据。
我们确定了影响侵入性思维发生的三个因素:“对侵入性思维的负面评价”、“应激反应”和“对侵入性思维的过度控制”。此外,根据这三个因素的评分模式,参与者被分为五个亚型,其特征是强迫症倾向的程度。进一步分析表明,这三个因素不能用强迫症倾向来解释。此外,还发现这五个亚型采用了不同的应对策略。
这些发现表明,侵入性思维不能仅由强迫症倾向的程度来完全解释,这可能为针对与侵入性思维相关的各种心理状态的认知行为支持提供有价值的见解。