Sutphen Rebecca, Xu Yan, Wilbanks George D, Fiorica James, Grendys Edward C, LaPolla James P, Arango Hector, Hoffman Mitchell S, Martino Martin, Wakeley Katie, Griffin David, Blanco Rafael W, Cantor Alan B, Xiao Yi-jin, Krischer Jeffrey P
Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology, College of Medicine and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, 33612, USA.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004 Jul;13(7):1185-91.
To determine whether lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and other lysophospholipids (LPL) are useful markers for diagnosis and/or prognosis of ovarian cancer in a controlled setting.
Plasma samples were collected from ovarian cancer patients and healthy control women in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties, Florida, and processed at the University of South Florida H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (Moffitt). Case patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (n = 117) and healthy control subjects (n = 27) participated in the study. Blinded LPL analysis, including 23 individual LPL species, was performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation using an electrospray ionization mass spectrometry-based method. LPL levels were transmitted to Moffitt, where clinical data were reviewed and statistical analyses were performed.
There were statistically significant differences between preoperative case samples (n = 45) and control samples (n = 27) in the mean levels of total LPA, total lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI), sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), and individual LPA species as well as the combination of several LPL species. The combination of 16:0-LPA and 20:4-LPA yielded the best discrimination between preoperative case samples and control samples, with 93.1% correct classification, 91.1% sensitivity, and 96.3% specificity. In 22 cases with both preoperative and postoperative samples, the postoperative levels of several LPL, including S1P, total LPA, and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) levels and some individual species of LPA and LPC, were significantly different from preoperative levels.
LPA, LPI, LPC, and S1P appear useful as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer.
在对照条件下确定溶血磷脂酸(LPA)和其他溶血磷脂(LPL)是否为卵巢癌诊断和/或预后的有用标志物。
从佛罗里达州希尔斯伯勒县和皮内拉斯县的卵巢癌患者及健康对照女性中采集血浆样本,并在南佛罗里达大学H. Lee Moffitt癌症中心和研究所(Moffitt)进行处理。上皮性卵巢癌病例患者(n = 117)和健康对照受试者(n = 27)参与了该研究。在克利夫兰诊所基金会采用基于电喷雾电离质谱的方法对包括23种个体LPL种类在内的LPL进行盲法分析。LPL水平被传送到Moffitt,在那里对临床数据进行审查并进行统计分析。
术前病例样本(n = 45)和对照样本(n = 27)在总LPA、总溶血磷脂酰肌醇(LPI)、鞘氨醇-1-磷酸(S1P)以及个体LPA种类和几种LPL种类组合的平均水平上存在统计学显著差异。16:0-LPA和20:4-LPA的组合在术前病例样本和对照样本之间产生了最佳区分效果,正确分类率为93.1%,灵敏度为91.1%,特异性为96.3%。在22例同时有术前和术后样本的病例中,包括S1P、总LPA和溶血磷脂酰胆碱(LPC)水平以及一些个体LPA和LPC种类在内的几种LPL的术后水平与术前水平有显著差异。
LPA、LPI、LPC和S1P似乎可作为卵巢癌的诊断和预后生物标志物。