Malmivuo Jaakko A, Suihko Veikko E
Ragnar Granit Institute, Tampere University of Technology, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004 Jul;51(7):1276-80. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827255.
The resistivity values of the different tissues of the head affect the lead fields of electroencephalography (EEG). When the head is modeled with a concentric spherical model, the different resistivity values have no effect on the lead fields of the magnetoencephalography (MEG). Recent publications indicate that the resistivity of the skull is much lower than what was estimated by Rush and Driscoll. At the moment, this information on skull resistivity is, however, slightly controversial. We have compared the spatial resolution of EEG and MEG for cortical sources by calculating the half-sensitivity volumes (HSVs) of EEG and MEG as a function of electrode and magnetometer distance, respectively, with the relative skull resistivity as a parameter. Because the spatial resolution is related to the HSV, these data give an overview of the effect of these parameters on the spatial resolution of both techniques. Our calculations show that, with the new information on the resistivity of the skull, in the spherical model for cortical sources the spatial resolution of the EEG is better than that of the MEG.
头部不同组织的电阻率值会影响脑电图(EEG)的导联场。当用同心球模型对头部进行建模时,不同的电阻率值对脑磁图(MEG)的导联场没有影响。最近的出版物表明,颅骨的电阻率远低于拉什和德里斯科尔的估计值。然而,目前关于颅骨电阻率的这一信息存在一定争议。我们通过分别计算EEG和MEG的半灵敏度体积(HSV)作为电极和磁力计距离的函数,并以相对颅骨电阻率为参数,比较了EEG和MEG对皮质源的空间分辨率。由于空间分辨率与HSV相关,这些数据概述了这些参数对两种技术空间分辨率的影响。我们的计算表明,根据关于颅骨电阻率的新信息,在皮质源的球形模型中,EEG的空间分辨率优于MEG。