Suppr超能文献

使用基于电阻抗断层成像(EIT)的方法对大脑和颅骨电阻率进行体内测量以及对体感诱发电位(SEF)/体感诱发电位(SEP)数据进行联合分析。

In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and the combined analysis of SEF/SEP data.

作者信息

Gonçalves S, de Munck J C, Verbunt J P A, Heethaar R M, da Silva F H Lopes

机构信息

MEG Centre--Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Reception C, De Boelelaan 1117,1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 Sep;50(9):1124-8. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2003.816072.

Abstract

Results of "in vivo" measurements of the skull and brain resistivities are presented for six subjects. Results are obtained using two different methods, based on spherical head models. The first method uses the principles of electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to estimate the equivalent electrical resistivities of brain (rhobrain), skull (rhoskull) and skin (rhoskin) according to. The second one estimates the same parameters through a combined analysis of the evoked somatosensory cortical response, recorded simultaneously using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). The EIT results, obtained with the same relative skull thickness (0.05) for all subjects, show a wide variation of the ratio rhoskull/rhobrain among subjects (average = 72, SD = 48%). However, the rhoskull/rhobrain ratios of the individual subjects are well reproduced by combined analysis of somatosensory evoked fields (SEF) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP). These preliminary results suggest that the rhoskull/rhobrain variations over subjects cannot be disregarded in the EEG inverse problem (IP) when a spherical model is used. The agreement between EIT and SEF/SEP points to the fact that whatever the source of variability, the proposed EIT-based method <Au: Addition of "method" O.K? appears to have the potential to reduce systematic errors in EEG IP associated to the misspecification of rhoskull/rhobrain, rhobrain, rhoskull and rhoskin.

摘要

本文展示了对六名受试者颅骨和大脑电阻率的“体内”测量结果。这些结果是基于球形头部模型,使用两种不同方法获得的。第一种方法利用电阻抗断层成像(EIT)原理,根据[具体依据未给出]来估计大脑(ρbrain)、颅骨(ρskull)和皮肤(ρskin)的等效电阻。第二种方法通过对同时使用脑磁图(MEG)和脑电图(EEG)记录的诱发体感皮层反应进行联合分析,来估计相同的参数。所有受试者的相对颅骨厚度均为0.05时所获得的EIT结果显示,受试者之间的ρskull/ρbrain比值存在很大差异(平均值 = 72,标准差 = 48%)。然而,通过对体感诱发电场(SEF)和体感诱发电位(SEP)的联合分析,能够很好地重现个体受试者的ρskull/ρbrain比值。这些初步结果表明,当使用球形模型时,在脑电图逆问题(IP)中,受试者之间ρskull/ρbrain的变化不容忽视。EIT与SEF/SEP之间的一致性表明,无论变异性的来源是什么,所提出的基于EIT的方法似乎有可能减少脑电图IP中与ρskull/ρbrain、ρbrain、ρskull和ρskin的错误指定相关的系统误差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验