Suppr超能文献

鼻过敏原激发试验中的鼻声反射测量:哪些维度测量是有意义的?

Acoustic rhinometry in nasal allergen challenge study: which dimensional measures are meaningful?

作者信息

Wang D Y, Raza M T, Goh D Y T, Lee B W, Chan Y H

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, The National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2004 Jul;34(7):1093-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.01988.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acoustic rhinometry (AR) is commonly used as a quantitative assessment of nasal response to nasal allergen challenge (NAC). However, sources of error and physical limitations of various AR area-distance measurements have not been adequately evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical value of AR measurements, and the relationship between subjective sensation and objective AR measurements in the NAC study.

METHODS

Nasal challenge using increasing concentrations of crude Blomia tropicalis (Bt) extracts (0.6, 6, and 60 microg/mL) was performed in 15 adult patients (eight males and seven females) with ongoing persistent allergic rhinitis. Subjective symptom scores of nasal obstruction were recorded together with the objective AR measurements of the minimum cross-sectional area (MCA), distance to MCA and cross-sectional area (CSA) at 3.3, 4.0 and 6.4 cm from the nostril, during the 7 h after the last challenge.

RESULTS

The dose-response increase in nasal obstruction score was significantly (P<0.001 for all) associated with decreases in mean MCA (r=0.75), mean CSA3.3 (r=0.54), mean CSA4.0 (r=0.53) and mean CSA6.4 (r=0.20). The mean MCA (+/-SD) for each subjective symptom score 0, 1, 2 and 3 was found to be 0.73 (+/-0.22) cm2, 0.63 (+/-0.29) cm2, 0.33 (+/-0.17) cm2 and 0.21 (+/-0.14) cm2, respectively. When the MCA (left and right separately) reached an area <0.2 cm2, measurements of CSA3.3 and CSA4.0 were significantly reduced by 60-70%.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that AR is a useful and objective investigational tool, which correlates well with the sensation of nasal obstruction. MCA, CSA3.3 and CSA4.0 are more reliable measurements than CSA6.4 due to physical limitations. It is important to note that when the MCA is smaller than 0.2 cm2, a common condition in the early-phase reaction, area-distance measurements beyond this point can be misinterpreted and should be considered with caution.

摘要

背景

鼻声反射测量法(AR)通常用于定量评估鼻腔对鼻过敏原激发试验(NAC)的反应。然而,各种AR面积-距离测量的误差来源和物理局限性尚未得到充分评估。

目的

在NAC研究中,探讨AR测量的临床价值以及主观感觉与客观AR测量之间的关系。

方法

对15例持续性变应性鼻炎成年患者(8例男性,7例女性)使用浓度递增的热带无爪螨(Bt)粗提物(0.6、6和60μg/mL)进行鼻腔激发试验。在最后一次激发后7小时内,记录鼻塞的主观症状评分,并同时测量距鼻孔3.3、4.0和6.4 cm处的最小横截面积(MCA)、至MCA的距离以及横截面积(CSA)等客观AR指标。

结果

鼻塞评分的剂量反应性增加与平均MCA(r = 0.75)、平均CSA3.3(r = 0.54)、平均CSA4.0(r = 0.53)和平均CSA6.4(r = 0.20)的降低显著相关(所有P<0.001)。发现主观症状评分为0、1、2和3时的平均MCA(±标准差)分别为0.73(±0.22)cm²、0.63(±0.29)cm²、0.33(±0.17)cm²和0.21(±0.14)cm²。当MCA(左右分别)面积<0.2 cm²时,CSA3.3和CSA4.0的测量值显著降低60 -70%。

结论

本研究表明,AR是一种有用的客观研究工具,与鼻塞感觉相关性良好。由于物理局限性,MCA、CSA3.3和CSA4.0比CSA6.4测量更可靠。需要注意的是,当MCA小于0.2 cm²时(早期反应中的常见情况),超过此点的面积-距离测量可能会被误解,应谨慎考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验