Suppr超能文献

全科医生检查单开具行为的差异:专业因素还是与环境相关的因素?

Variation in test ordering behaviour of GPs: professional or context-related factors?

作者信息

Verstappen Wim H J M, ter Riet Gerben, Dubois Willy I, Winkens Ron, Grol Richard P T M, van der Weijden Trudy

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research, Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2004 Aug;21(4):387-95. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh408.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe GPs' test ordering behaviour, and to establish professional and context-related determinants of GPs' inclination to order tests.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was carried out of 229 GPs in 40 local GP groups from five regions in The Netherlands of the combined number of 19 laboratory and eight imaging tests ordered by GPs, collected from five regional diagnostic centres. In a multivariable multilevel regression analysis, these data were linked with survey data on professional characteristics such as knowledge about and attitude towards test ordering, and with data on context-related factors such as practice type or experience with feedback on test ordering data. The main outcome measure was the percentage point differences associated with professional and context-related factors.

RESULTS

The total median number of tests per GP per year was 998 (interquartile range 663-1500), with significant differences between the regions. The response to the survey was 97%. At the professional level, 'individual involvement in developing guidelines' (yes versus no), and at the context-related level 'group practice' (versus single-handed and two-person practices) and 'more than 1 year of experience working with a problem-oriented laboratory order form' (yes versus no) were associated with 27, 18 and 41% lower numbers of tests ordered, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In addition to professional determinants, context-related factors appeared to be strongly associated with the numbers of tests ordered. Further studies on GPs' test ordering behaviour should include local and regional factors.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述全科医生的检查开单行为,并确定与专业及背景相关的因素,这些因素会影响全科医生开单检查的倾向。

方法

对荷兰五个地区40个当地全科医生小组中的229名全科医生进行横断面分析,数据来自五个地区诊断中心收集的全科医生开出的19项实验室检查和8项影像检查的总数。在多变量多层次回归分析中,这些数据与关于专业特征(如对检查开单的知识和态度)的调查数据,以及与背景相关因素(如执业类型或检查开单数据反馈经验)的数据相关联。主要结局指标是与专业及背景相关因素相关的百分点差异。

结果

每位全科医生每年检查的总中位数为998项(四分位间距663 - 1500),各地区之间存在显著差异。调查的回复率为97%。在专业层面,“个人参与制定指南”(是与否),以及在背景相关层面,“团体执业”(与单人及两人执业相比)和“使用以问题为导向的实验室检查申请单工作超过1年”(是与否),分别与开出检查数量降低27%、18%和41%相关。

结论

除了专业因素外,背景相关因素似乎与检查开单数量密切相关。关于全科医生检查开单行为的进一步研究应包括当地和地区因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验