Korman H J, Mulholland T L, Huang R
Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital and Cancer Center, 3577 w.13 Mile Road, Suite 202, Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073 USA.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7(3):249-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.pcan.4500723.
To assess fecal incontinence rates and bowel function for radical perineal (RPP) or radical retropubic (RRP) prostatectomy patients and to compare them with a matched control group.
The bowel function domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) was mailed to 150 consecutive patients who had undergone RPP (79) or RRP (71) by the same surgeon (HJK) and an age-matched control group (75).
Fecal incontinence and bowel dysfunction were statistically equivalent for the study groups.
There is no difference in fecal incontinence rates or bowel function when comparing RPP patients to RRP or control patients.
评估行根治性会阴前列腺切除术（RPP）或根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术（RRP）的患者的大便失禁发生率及肠道功能，并与匹配的对照组进行比较。
将扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表（EPIC）的肠道功能领域部分邮寄给由同一位外科医生（HJK）实施RPP（79例）或RRP（71例）的150例连续患者，以及一个年龄匹配的对照组（75例）。
研究组之间的大便失禁和肠道功能障碍在统计学上相当。
比较RPP患者与RRP患者或对照患者时，大便失禁发生率或肠道功能无差异。
Zotero 插件