• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨盆径线测量对机器人辅助经会阴根治性前列腺切除术患者手术成功率的影响。

Effect of pelvimetric diameters on success of surgery in patients submitted to robot-assisted perineal radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):425-433. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0413.

DOI:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0413
PMID:32167708
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7088495/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Minimally invasive techniques are used increasingly by virtue of advancements in technology. Surgery for prostate cancer, which has high morbidity, is performed with an increasing momentum based on the successful oncological and functional outcomes as well as cosmetic aspects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

62 patients underwent robot-assisted perineal radical prostatectomy (R-PRP) surgery at our clinic between November 2016 and August 2017. Six pelvimetric dimensions were defined and measured by performing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) prior to operation in all patients. In light of these data, we aimed to investigate the effect of pelvimetric measurements on surgery duration and surgical margin positivity.

RESULTS

By using this technique in pelvic area, we observed that measurements only representing surgical site and excluding other pelvic organs had a significant effect on surgery duration, and pelvic dimensions had no significant effect on surgical margin positivity.

CONCLUSION

In R-PRP technique, peroperative findings and oncological outcomes can vary depending on several variable factors, but although usually not taken into account, pelvimetric measurements can also affect these outcomes. However, there is a need for randomised controlled trials to be conducted with more patients.

摘要

目的

随着技术的进步,微创技术的应用越来越多。由于在肿瘤学和功能结果以及美容方面取得了成功,具有高发病率的前列腺癌的手术也在基于这些方面的成功基础上越来越多地进行。

材料与方法

2016 年 11 月至 2017 年 8 月期间,我们诊所对 62 例患者进行了机器人辅助经会阴根治性前列腺切除术(R-PRP)手术。所有患者在手术前均进行多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI),定义并测量了 6 个骨盆尺寸。根据这些数据,我们旨在研究骨盆测量对手术时间和手术边缘阳性率的影响。

结果

通过在骨盆区域使用这种技术,我们观察到仅代表手术部位且不包括其他骨盆器官的测量值对手术时间有显著影响,而骨盆尺寸对手术边缘阳性率没有显著影响。

结论

在 R-PRP 技术中,手术部位的发现和肿瘤学结果可能因几个变量因素而异,但尽管通常不被考虑在内,骨盆测量值也可能影响这些结果。然而,需要进行更多患者的随机对照试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/ca285d25e466/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/df438f7b63fd/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/441bfd2d51e1/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/caa4da6d70c1/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/55923bfb62f5/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/ca01e42ee789/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/928dd097c542/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/a24eb14be54c/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/f0dcf113bd2f/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/7460aab3edfe/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/ca285d25e466/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/df438f7b63fd/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/441bfd2d51e1/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/caa4da6d70c1/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/55923bfb62f5/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/ca01e42ee789/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/928dd097c542/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/a24eb14be54c/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf07.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/f0dcf113bd2f/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf08.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/7460aab3edfe/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf09.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/684d/7088495/ca285d25e466/1677-6119-ibju-46-03-0425-gf10.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of pelvimetric diameters on success of surgery in patients submitted to robot-assisted perineal radical prostatectomy.骨盆径线测量对机器人辅助经会阴根治性前列腺切除术患者手术成功率的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):425-433. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0413.
2
Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: a review of 95 cases.机器人辅助经会阴前列腺根治术:95 例回顾。
BJU Int. 2020 Apr;125(4):573-578. doi: 10.1111/bju.15018. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
3
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Editorial Comment: Effect of pelvimetric diameters on success of surgery in patients submitted to robot-assisted perineal radical prostatectomy.编辑评论:骨盆测量直径对接受机器人辅助会阴根治性前列腺切除术患者手术成功率的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):434-435. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0413.1.
5
Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy after Previous Bladder Outlet Surgery: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Comparative Studies.既往膀胱出口手术后继发的微创前列腺癌根治术:系统评价和荟萃分析的比较研究。
J Urol. 2019 Sep;202(3):511-517. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000312. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
6
MRI Displays the Prostatic Cancer Anatomy and Improves the Bundles Management Before Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.磁共振成像(MRI)可显示前列腺癌的解剖结构,并改善机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术之前对神经束的处理。
J Endourol. 2018 Apr;32(4):315-321. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0701.
7
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
8
Single-Port Robot-Assisted Perineal Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: Step-by-Step Technique in a Cadaveric Model.单孔机器人辅助经会阴前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结清扫术:尸体模型中的分步技术。
J Endourol. 2018 May;32(S1):S93-S96. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0707.
9
Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.在日本外科医生早期开展机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的经验中,保留神经和手术切缘的实际情况。
Int J Urol. 2017 Mar;24(3):191-196. doi: 10.1111/iju.13281. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
Robotic radical perineal prostatectomy: tradition and evolution in the robotic era.机器人辅助经会阴前列腺根治性切除术:机器人时代的传统与演进。
Curr Opin Urol. 2021 Jan;31(1):11-17. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000830.

引用本文的文献

1
Incontinence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a reverse systematic review.腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁:一项反向系统评价。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 May-Jun;48(3):389-396. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0632.
2
Editorial Comment: Effect of pelvimetric diameters on success of surgery in patients submitted to robot-assisted perineal radical prostatectomy.编辑评论:骨盆测量直径对接受机器人辅助会阴根治性前列腺切除术患者手术成功率的影响。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 May-Jun;46(3):434-435. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0413.1.

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases.机器人辅助经会阴根治性前列腺切除术:15例的首次经验
Turk J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(4):476-483. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.35488. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
2
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放式经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照 3 期研究的早期结果。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 10;388(10049):1057-1066. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30592-X. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on blood loss during retropubic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
呼气末正压对耻骨后及机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中失血的影响。
Int J Urol. 2016 Aug;23(8):674-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.13125. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Comparative analysis of radical prostatectomy techniques using perineal or suprapubic approach in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2010 Jun;8(2):200-4. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082010AO1592.
5
Independent predictors of prolonged operative time during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中手术时间延长的独立预测因素。
J Robot Surg. 2015 Jun;9(2):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s11701-015-0497-0. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的陷阱:机器人手术与腹腔镜手术切缘阳性情况的比较
Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):976-9. doi: 10.1111/iju.12492. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
7
A prospective study of transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes after 36-month follow-up.一项从腹腔镜到机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的前瞻性研究:36 个月随访后的生活质量结果。
Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.01.017. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
8
Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.原发前列腺癌手术治疗中切缘阳性率和围手术期并发症发生率的系统评价和荟萃分析:比较经耻骨后、腹腔镜和机器人前列腺切除术。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
9
Pelvimetric dimensions do not impact upon nerve sparing or erectile function recovery in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.骨盆测量尺寸不会影响接受根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术的患者的神经保留或勃起功能恢复。
J Sex Med. 2011 Feb;8(2):567-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01911.x.
10
The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy.前列腺尖部的深度是前列腺根治性切除术时切缘阳性的独立预测因子。
BJU Int. 2010 Sep;106(5):622-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09184.x.