Suppr超能文献

p73和p63:我们为何仍然需要它们?

p73 and p63: why do we still need them?

作者信息

Blandino Giovanni, Dobbelstein Matthias

机构信息

Department of Experimental Oncology, Regina Elena Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Cell Cycle. 2004 Jul;3(7):886-94. Epub 2004 Jul 2.

Abstract

When p73 and p63 were initially described as homologues of the tumor suppressor p53, the three family members seemed almost exchangeable, raising the question why all three were retained during evolution. It later turned out that the corresponding genes, TP63 and TP73, appear phylogenetically older than TP53, and that their targeted deletion causes severe developmental defects, in contrast to a deletion of TP53. Hence, p63 and p73 are responsible for biological effects that cannot be elicited by p53 alone. Here, we provide an overview of properties ascribed to p63 and p73 that distinguish them from p53. Differences occur at the following levels: (i) protein structure, especially with regard to the aminoterminal transactivation domains and the carboxyterminal portions unique to p63 and p73; (ii) regulation, affecting mRNA levels, posttranslational modifications and interaction with other cellular proteins; (iii) activities, resulting in the regulation of gene expression, the programming of development, and the emergence of tumors. We speculate that, during the course of evolution, p63 and p73 have first pursued a broader range of activities, whereas p53 later specialized on genome maintenance.

摘要

当p73和p63最初被描述为肿瘤抑制因子p53的同源物时,这三个家族成员似乎几乎可以相互替代,这就引发了一个问题:为什么这三者在进化过程中都被保留了下来。后来发现,相应的基因TP63和TP73在系统发育上比TP53更古老,而且与TP53缺失相比,它们的靶向缺失会导致严重的发育缺陷。因此,p63和p73负责一些p53单独无法引发的生物学效应。在此,我们概述了p63和p73与p53不同的特性。差异体现在以下几个层面:(i)蛋白质结构,特别是氨基末端反式激活结构域以及p63和p73特有的羧基末端部分;(ii)调控,影响mRNA水平、翻译后修饰以及与其他细胞蛋白的相互作用;(iii)活性,导致基因表达调控、发育编程以及肿瘤的出现。我们推测,在进化过程中,p63和p73最初具有更广泛的活性,而p53后来专门负责基因组维护。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验