Hopley C, Salkeld G, Mitchell P
Centre for Vision Research, University of Sydney, Department of Ophthalmology, Westmead Millennium Institute, Australia.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;88(8):982-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.039131.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of severe vision impairment and blindness in older people throughout the developed world and currently affects around 420 000 UK citizens. Choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) is treatable with photodynamic therapy (PDT) but is expensive at over pound 1200 per treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the cost utility of PDT for better eye, predominantly classic, subfoveal choroidal neovascular lesions secondary to AMD.
Cost utility analysis (CUA) was conducted to estimate the cost effectiveness of PDT for scenarios involving reasonable (6/12) and poor (6/60) visual acuity. The models incorporated data from the Treatment of Age-related Macular Degeneration with PDT (TAP) Study and patient based utilities. The incremental CUA was based on decision analytical models, comparing treatment to a placebo comparator. Extensive one way sensitivity analysis of parameters was conducted to determine the robustness of the model. A discount rate of 6% was used for costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY).
Model 1: in people with reasonable initial visual acuity, the cost utility of treating applicable neovascular AMD lesions was pound 31 607 per QALY saved, with a sensitivity analysis range from pound 25 285 to pound 37 928. Model 2: in people with poor initial visual acuity, the cost utility was pound 63 214 per QALY saved, with a sensitivity analysis range from pound 54 183 to pound 75 856.
PDT treatment is the only available treatment for some forms of neovascular ("wet") AMD. Under these assumptions, PDT can be considered moderately cost effective for those with reasonable visual acuity but less cost effective for those with initial poor visual acuity. These findings have implications for ophthalmic practice and healthcare planning.
背景/目的:年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是发达国家老年人严重视力损害和失明的主要原因,目前约有42万英国公民受其影响。脉络膜新生血管(CNV)可通过光动力疗法(PDT)进行治疗,但每次治疗费用超过1200英镑,较为昂贵。本研究的目的是评估PDT治疗继发于AMD的较好眼(主要为典型性、黄斑中心凹下脉络膜新生血管病变)的成本效益。
进行成本效益分析(CUA),以估计PDT在视力合理(6/12)和较差(6/60)情况下的成本效益。模型纳入了光动力疗法治疗年龄相关性黄斑变性(TAP)研究的数据以及基于患者的效用值。增量CUA基于决策分析模型,将治疗与安慰剂对照进行比较。对参数进行了广泛的单因素敏感性分析,以确定模型的稳健性。成本和质量调整生命年(QALY)采用6%的贴现率。
模型1:对于初始视力合理的人群,治疗适用的新生血管性AMD病变的成本效益为每挽救一个QALY 31607英镑,敏感性分析范围为25285英镑至37928英镑。模型2:对于初始视力较差的人群,成本效益为每挽救一个QALY 63214英镑,敏感性分析范围为54183英镑至75856英镑。
PDT治疗是某些形式的新生血管性(“湿性”)AMD的唯一可用治疗方法。在这些假设下,对于视力合理的患者,PDT可被认为具有中等成本效益,但对于初始视力较差的患者,成本效益较低。这些发现对眼科实践和医疗保健规划具有重要意义。