Smith D H, Fenn P, Drummond M
Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, 3800 N Interstate Ave, Portland, OR 97211, USA.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Sep;88(9):1107-12. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.023986.
To estimate the potential cost effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in the UK setting.
Using data from a variety of sources a Markov model was built to produce estimates of the cost effectiveness (incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) and incremental cost per vision year gained) of PDT for two cohorts of patients (one with starting visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 and one at 20/100) with predominantly classic choroidal neovascular disease over a 2 year and 5 year time horizon. A government perspective and a treatment cost only perspective were considered. Probabilistic and one way sensitivity analyses were undertaken.
From the government perspective, over the 2 year period, the expected incremental cost effectiveness ratios range from 286 000 (starting VA 20/100) to 76 000 UK pounds (starting VA 20/40) per QALY gained and from 14 000 (20/100) to 34 000 UK pounds (20/40) per vision year gained. A 5 year perspective yields incremental ratios less than 5000 UK pounds for vision years gained and from 9000 (20/40) to 30 000 UK pounds (20/100) for QALYs gained. Without societal or NHS cost offsets included, the 2 year incremental cost per vision year gained ranges from 20 000 (20/100) to 40 000 UK pounds (20/40), and the 2 year incremental cost per QALY gained ranges from 412 000 (20/100) to 90 000 UK pounds (20/40). The 5 year time frame shows expected costs of 7000 (20/40) to 10 000 UK pounds (20/100) per vision year gained and from 38 000 (20/40) to 69 000 UK pounds (20/100) per QALY gained.
This evaluation suggests that early treatment (that is, treating eyes at less severe stages of disease) with PDT leads to increased efficiency. When considering only the cost of therapy, treating people at lower levels of visual acuity would probably not be considered cost effective. However, a broad perspective that incorporates other NHS treatment costs and social care costs suggests that over a long period of time, PDT may yield reasonable value for money.
评估在英国使用维替泊芬进行光动力疗法(PDT)的潜在成本效益。
利用来自多种来源的数据建立了一个马尔可夫模型,以估算两组主要患有典型脉络膜新生血管疾病的患者(一组初始视力为20/40,另一组为20/100)在2年和5年时间范围内接受PDT治疗的成本效益(每质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本以及每获得一个视力年的增量成本)。考虑了政府视角和仅治疗成本视角。进行了概率分析和单因素敏感性分析。
从政府视角来看,在2年期间,每获得一个QALY的预期增量成本效益比范围从286,000英镑(初始视力20/100)到76,000英镑(初始视力20/40),每获得一个视力年的增量成本效益比范围从14,000英镑(20/100)到34,000英镑(20/40)。从5年视角来看,每获得一个视力年的增量成本效益比小于5000英镑,每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比范围从9000英镑(20/40)到30,000英镑(20/100)。若不考虑社会或国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的成本抵消,每获得一个视力年的2年增量成本范围从20,000英镑(20/100)到40,000英镑(20/40),每获得一个QALY的2年增量成本范围从412,000英镑(20/100)到90,000英镑(20/40)。5年时间框架显示,每获得一个视力年的预期成本范围从7000英镑(20/40)到10,000英镑(20/100),每获得一个QALY的预期成本范围从38,000英镑(20/40)到69,000英镑(20/100)。
该评估表明,早期治疗(即在疾病较轻阶段治疗眼睛)使用PDT可提高效率。仅考虑治疗成本时,治疗视力较低的患者可能不被认为具有成本效益。然而,纳入其他NHS治疗成本和社会护理成本的广泛视角表明,从长期来看,PDT可能具有合理的性价比。