• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究:分类错误儿童的龋齿增量

The University of North Carolina caries risk assessment study: caries increments of misclassified children.

作者信息

Graves R C, Disney J A, Beck J D, Abernathy J R, Stamm J W, Bohannan H M

机构信息

Department of Dental Ecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.

出版信息

Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;20(4):169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb01710.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb01710.x
PMID:1526098
Abstract

The University of North Carolina caries risk assessment was conducted between 1986 and 1989 with 5000 children initially in grades 1 and 5 from low fluoride sites in South Carolina and Maine. Clinical, microbiologic, behavioral, and demographic factors served as independent variables used in logistic multiple regression models to determine the predicted caries risk classification of each child. The 3-yr DMFS increment of each child was the dependent variable, and the 20-25% of those in each cohort with the highest increment were considered the high risk group. Sensitivity and specificity values averaged 0.60 and 0.83 respectively, indicating the misclassification of substantial numbers of children. This paper reports analysis of the DMFS increments of the misclassified children. The majority of children had DMFS increments within one or two surfaces of the classification cut points. Many false negative children had increments composed entirely of filled surfaces, often of minimal extent and without evidence of previous decay. Many false positive children had increments composed of decayed surfaces and would have benefitted from being identified as high risk and assigned to a preventive program. Other false positive children had sealants placed after the baseline examination that undoubtedly reduced their true increment. It is concluded that the consequences of misclassification are not serious for most children in this study.

摘要

北卡罗来纳大学的龋齿风险评估于1986年至1989年期间进行,最初选取了南卡罗来纳州和缅因州低氟地区的5000名一年级和五年级儿童。临床、微生物学、行为和人口统计学因素作为自变量,用于逻辑多元回归模型,以确定每个儿童的预测龋齿风险分类。每个儿童的3年恒牙龋失补牙面数(DMFS)增量为因变量,每个队列中增量最高的20%-25%儿童被视为高风险组。敏感性和特异性值分别平均为0.60和0.83,表明大量儿童被错误分类。本文报告了对被错误分类儿童的DMFS增量的分析。大多数儿童的DMFS增量在分类切点的一个或两个牙面范围内。许多假阴性儿童的增量完全由补牙面组成,通常范围很小且没有先前龋齿的证据。许多假阳性儿童的增量由龋坏牙面组成,若被识别为高风险并被纳入预防计划,他们会从中受益。其他假阳性儿童在基线检查后进行了窝沟封闭,这无疑降低了他们的实际增量。研究得出结论,在本研究中,错误分类对大多数儿童的影响并不严重。

相似文献

1
The University of North Carolina caries risk assessment study: caries increments of misclassified children.北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究:分类错误儿童的龋齿增量
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;20(4):169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb01710.x.
2
The University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment study: further developments in caries risk prediction.北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究:龋齿风险预测的进一步发展
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992 Apr;20(2):64-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb00679.x.
3
University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study: comparisons of high risk prediction, any risk prediction, and any risk etiologic models.北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究:高风险预测、任何风险预测和任何风险病因模型的比较
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;20(6):313-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb00690.x.
4
Distribution of primary tooth caries in first-grade children from two nonfluoridated US communities.美国两个未实施氟化措施社区一年级儿童的乳牙龋病分布情况。
Pediatr Dent. 1994 May-Jun;16(3):200-5.
5
University of North Carolina caries risk assessment study. III. Multiple factors in caries prevalence.北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究。III. 龋齿患病率的多种因素
J Public Health Dent. 1991 Summer;51(3):134-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1991.tb02204.x.
6
Comparative effectiveness of visual/tactile and simplified screening examinations in caries risk assessment.视觉/触觉与简化筛查检查在龋齿风险评估中的比较效果
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992 Dec;20(6):326-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1992.tb00692.x.
7
Prospective study of 5-year caries increment among children receiving comprehensive dental care in the New England children's amalgam trial.新英格兰儿童汞合金试验中接受全面牙科护理儿童5年龋齿增量的前瞻性研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;37(1):9-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00437.x. Epub 2008 Sep 8.
8
Classification tree prediction models for dental caries from clinical, microbiological, and interview data.基于临床、微生物学和访谈数据的龋齿分类树预测模型。
J Dent Res. 1991 Sep;70(9):1239-51. doi: 10.1177/00220345910700090301.
9
The University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study. II. Baseline caries prevalence.北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究。II. 基线龋齿患病率。
J Public Health Dent. 1990 Spring;50(3):178-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1990.tb02112.x.
10
The University of North Carolina Caries Risk Assessment Study. I: Rationale and content.北卡罗来纳大学龋齿风险评估研究。I:基本原理与内容。
J Public Health Dent. 1988 Fall;48(4):225-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1988.tb03203.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Root caries risk indicators: a systematic review of risk models.根面龋风险指标:风险模型的系统评价。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010 Oct;38(5):383-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00551.x.