Suppr超能文献

七氟醚与硫喷妥钠相比的快速诱导。

Rapid sevoflurane induction compared with thiopental.

作者信息

Lewis Michael C, TerRiet Menno, DeLaCruz Luis, Matadial Christina M, Gerenstein Ricardo, DeSouza Gerard, Chidiac Gilbert J

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, V.A. Medical Center, Miami, FL 33125, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2004 Jun;16(4):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.09.007.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To examine whether the speed of induction of anesthesia with sevoflurane/nitrous oxide (N2O) utilizing a 10-second vital capacity rapid inhalation induction (VCRII) followed by tidal breathing was similar or faster than cautious intravenous (i.v.V) thiopental induction with inhaled N2O.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study.

SETTING

Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

PATIENTS

50 male ASA physical status I, II, and III patients scheduled for general anesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive either 8% sevoflurane or i.v. thiopental. Patients were allocated to one of two groups of 25 patients each. In both groups, the breathing circuit was initially primed for 5 minutes with (4 L/min) and O2 (2 L/min), while the Y-piece was occluded. In the sevoflurane group, the circuit was additionally primed with 8% sevoflurane. Patients were trained to perform a vital capacity breath. After maximal exhalation, the occluding plug was rapidly removed from the Y-piece and connected to the facemask. The patient then inspired to vital capacity, held his breath for 10 seconds, and then was allowed to breathe normally. At the end of the 10-second breathhold, and as the patient started normal breathing, either thiopental (thiopental group) or normal saline (sevoflurane group) was injected at a rate of 4 mL every 10 seconds.

MEASUREMENTS

A study-blinded observer recorded the time to induction, as defined by the time to loss of eyelash reflex, and noted the occurrence of side effects.

MAIN RESULTS

The speed of induction was the same for both groups (p > 0.05). An average of eight breaths was required before loss of eyelash reflex. Side effects occurred in 36% of the patients in the thiopental group, and 32% in the sevoflurane group (p > 0.05); these were minor and did not affect induction.

CONCLUSION

Sevoflurane/N2O VCRII as used in this investigation is an effective inhalation technique; it resulted in an induction time similar to that of slow i.v. thiopental with inhaled N2O.

摘要

研究目的

探讨采用10秒肺活量快速吸入诱导(VCRII)继以潮气量呼吸的七氟醚/氧化亚氮(N2O)麻醉诱导速度是否与吸入N2O的谨慎静脉注射硫喷妥钠诱导相似或更快。

设计

前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。

地点

退伍军人事务医疗中心。

患者

50例计划接受全身麻醉的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况I、II和III级的男性患者。

干预措施

患者随机接受8%七氟醚或静脉注射硫喷妥钠。患者被分为两组,每组25例。两组中,呼吸回路最初均用空气(4L/分钟)和氧气(2L/分钟)预充5分钟,同时Y形接头被封堵。在七氟醚组中,回路还用8%七氟醚预充。患者接受进行肺活量呼吸的训练。在最大呼气后,快速从Y形接头上取下封堵塞并连接到面罩。患者然后吸气至肺活量,屏气10秒,然后正常呼吸。在10秒屏气结束时,当患者开始正常呼吸时,以每10秒4mL的速度注射硫喷妥钠(硫喷妥钠组)或生理盐水(七氟醚组)。

测量

一名对研究不知情的观察者记录诱导时间,诱导时间定义为睫毛反射消失的时间,并记录副作用的发生情况。

主要结果

两组的诱导速度相同(p>0.05)。睫毛反射消失前平均需要8次呼吸。硫喷妥钠组36%的患者出现副作用,七氟醚组为32%(p>0.05);这些副作用轻微,不影响诱导。

结论

本研究中使用的七氟醚/N2O VCRII是一种有效的吸入技术;其诱导时间与吸入N2O的缓慢静脉注射硫喷妥钠相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验