Martin Ingerith, McDonald Skye
University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney, Australia.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2004 Jun;34(3):311-28. doi: 10.1023/b:jadd.0000029553.52889.15.
Individuals with Asperger Syndrome (AS), a high functioning variant of Autism, are often noted to possess intact language ability, yet fail to use this language capacity to engage in interactive communication. This difficulty using language in a social context has been referred to as a deficit in pragmatic language. In particular, difficulty understanding nonliteral language devices, such as irony has been observed. This paper examines the veracity of two theories that have attempted to explain the causes of pragmatic language difficulties in individuals with Asperger Syndrome; the theory of Weak Central Coherence (WCC) and Social Inference theory. Fourteen young adults with AS and 24 age-matched controls were assessed on cognitive tasks measuring WCC processes, social inference or Theory of Mind ability, and the ability to interpret ironic remarks. Results indicated that the ability to understand the belief states of others is critical to understanding ironic language in AS.
阿斯伯格综合征(AS)患者属于自闭症的高功能变体,他们通常具有完好的语言能力,但却无法运用这种语言能力进行互动交流。在社交情境中运用语言的这种困难被称为语用语言缺陷。尤其是,人们观察到他们在理解非字面语言手段(如反讽)方面存在困难。本文探讨了两种试图解释阿斯伯格综合征患者语用语言困难成因的理论的真实性;弱中央统合理论(WCC)和社会推理理论。对14名患有阿斯伯格综合征的年轻人以及24名年龄匹配的对照组人员进行了认知任务评估,这些任务测量的是WCC过程、社会推理或心理理论能力,以及理解反讽言论的能力。结果表明,理解他人信念状态的能力对于理解阿斯伯格综合征患者的反讽语言至关重要。