MRC Cognitive Development Unit, London.
J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Spring;7(2):196-208. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.2.196.
Abstract Many species can respond to the behavior of their conspecifics. Human children, and perhaps some nonhuman primates, also have the capacity to respond to the mental states of their conspecifics, i.e., they have a "theory of mind." On the basis of previous research on the theory-of-mind impairment in people with autism, together with animal models of intentionality, Brothers and Ring (1992) postulated a broad cognitive module whose function is to build representations of other individuals. We evaluate the details of this hypothesis through a series of experiments on language, face processing, and theory of mind carried out with subjects with Williams syndrome, a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder resulting in an uneven lin-guisticocognitive profile. The results are discussed in terms of how the comparison of different phenotypes (e.g., Williams syndrome, Down syndrome, autism, and hydrocephaly with associated myelomeningocele) can contribute both to understanding the neuropsychology of social cognition and to current thinking about the purported modularity of the brain.
许多物种能够对同种个体的行为做出反应。人类儿童,也许还有一些非人类灵长类动物,也具有对同种个体心理状态做出反应的能力,即他们具有“心理理论”。基于先前对自闭症患者心理理论障碍的研究,以及意向性的动物模型,Brothers 和 Ring(1992 年)提出了一个广泛的认知模块,其功能是构建对其他个体的表示。我们通过对语言、面部处理和心理理论进行的一系列实验,用患有威廉姆斯综合征的受试者来评估这个假设的细节,威廉姆斯综合征是一种罕见的遗传性神经发育障碍,导致语言认知能力不平衡。结果将根据不同表型(例如,威廉姆斯综合征、唐氏综合征、自闭症和伴有脊髓脊膜膨出的脑积水)的比较如何有助于理解社会认知的神经心理学,以及当前对大脑所谓模块性的思考进行讨论。