Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
The Seaver Autism Center for Research and Treatment, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):135-151. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3645.
Many studies have investigated impairments in cognitive domains in adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Yet, to date, a comprehensive overview on the patterns of cognitive functioning is lacking.
To provide an overview of nonsocial and social cognitive functioning in various domains in adults with ASD, allowing for comparison of the severity of deficits between different domains.
A literature search performed in an academic medical setting was conducted using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Medline databases with the combination of the following free-text and Medical Subject Headings where applicable: [cogniti* OR neurocogniti* OR neuropsycholog* OR executive function* OR IQ OR intelligence quotient OR social cognition OR emotion perception OR affect perception OR emotion recognition OR attribution OR ToM OR mentalising OR mentalizing OR prosody OR social knowledge OR mind reading OR social cue OR social judgment] AND [autis* OR ASD OR Asperger OR Asperger's OR PDD OR pervasive developmental disorder]. The search was further limited to studies published between 1980 (first inclusion of autism diagnosis in the DSM-III) and July 2018.
Studies included were published as a primary peer-reviewed research article in English, included individuals with ASD 16 years or older, and assessed at least 1 domain of neurocognitive functioning or social cognition using standard measures.
Of 9892 articles identified and screened, 75 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hedges g effect sizes were computed, and random-effects models were used for all analyses. Moderators of between-study variability in effect sizes were assessed using meta-regressions.
The systematic review and meta-analysis included 75 studies, with a combined sample of 3361 individuals with ASD (mean [SD] age, 32.0 [9.3] years; 75.9% male) and 5344 neurotypical adults (mean [SD] age, 32.3 [9.1] years; 70.1% male). Adults with ASD showed large impairments in theory of mind (g = -1.09; 95% CI, -1.25 to -0.92; number of studies = 39) and emotion perception and processing (g = -0.80; 95% CI, -1.04 to -0.55; n = 18), followed by medium impairments in processing speed (g = -0.61; 95% CI, -0.83 to -0.38; n = 21) and verbal learning and memory (g = -0.55; 95% CI, -0.86 to -0.25; n = 12). The least altered cognitive domains were attention and vigilance (g = -0.30; 95% CI, -0.81 to 0.21; n = 5) and working memory (g = -0.23; 95% CI, -0.47 to 0.01; n = 19). Meta-regressions confirmed robustness of the results.
Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that adults with ASD show impairments in social cognitive domains and in specific nonsocial cognitive domains. These findings contribute to the understanding of the patterns of cognitive functioning in adults with ASD and may assist in the identification of targets for cognitive interventions.
许多研究已经调查了自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)成人在认知领域的障碍。然而,迄今为止,缺乏对认知功能模式的综合概述。
提供 ASD 成人在各个领域的非社交和社交认知功能概述,允许比较不同领域之间的缺陷严重程度。
在学术医疗环境中进行的文献检索,使用 PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase 和 Medline 数据库,结合以下自由文本和适用的医学主题词进行组合:[认知或神经认知或神经心理学或执行功能或智商或智力商数或社会认知或情绪感知或情感感知或情绪识别或归因或 ToM 或心理化或心理化或韵律或社会知识或读心术或社会线索或社会判断]和[自闭症*或 ASD 或阿斯伯格或阿斯伯格综合征或 PDD 或广泛性发育障碍]。搜索进一步限于 1980 年(DSM-III 首次纳入自闭症诊断)至 2018 年 7 月发表的研究。
包括发表为英文主要同行评审研究文章、纳入年龄在 16 岁及以上的 ASD 个体、并使用标准测量评估至少 1 个神经认知功能或社会认知领域的研究。
在筛选出的 9892 篇文章中,有 75 篇符合系统评价和荟萃分析的纳入标准。
计算了 Hedges g 效应大小,并对所有分析使用随机效应模型。使用元回归评估了效应大小之间研究差异的调节因素。
系统评价和荟萃分析包括 75 项研究,共有 3361 名 ASD 个体(平均[标准差]年龄,32.0[9.3]岁;75.9%为男性)和 5344 名神经典型成年人(平均[标准差]年龄,32.3[9.1]岁;70.1%为男性)纳入综合样本。ASD 成人在心理理论(g=-1.09;95%置信区间,-1.25 至-0.92;研究数量=39)和情绪感知和处理(g=-0.80;95%置信区间,-1.04 至-0.55;研究数量=18)方面表现出较大的损伤,其次是在处理速度(g=-0.61;95%置信区间,-0.83 至-0.38;研究数量=21)和言语学习和记忆(g=-0.55;95%置信区间,-0.86 至-0.25;研究数量=12)方面表现出中等损伤。受影响最小的认知领域是注意力和警觉性(g=-0.30;95%置信区间,-0.81 至 0.21;研究数量=5)和工作记忆(g=-0.23;95%置信区间,-0.47 至 0.01;研究数量=19)。元回归证实了结果的稳健性。
本系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,ASD 成人在社交认知领域和特定非社交认知领域存在损伤。这些发现有助于理解 ASD 成人的认知功能模式,并可能有助于确定认知干预的目标。