Suppr超能文献

胶囊内镜和推进式小肠镜在不明原因消化道出血诊断中的应用

Capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy in the diagnosis of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

作者信息

Ge Zhi-zheng, Hu Yun-biao, Xiao Shu-dong

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease, Shanghai Second Medical University, 200001, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Jul;117(7):1045-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, it is often difficult to detect the bleeding sites located in the small bowel with conventional radiological, scintigraphic or angiographic techniques. Push enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy are currently considered to be the most effective diagnostic procedures. The aim of this study was to compare the detection rates between capsule endoscopy and push enteroscopy.

METHODS

From May 2002 through January 2003, we prospectively examined by capsule endoscopy 39 patients with suspected small bowel diseases, in particular GI bleeding of unknown origin in Renji Hospital. Among them, 32 complained of obscure recurrent GI bleeding. Between January 1993 and October 1996, we used push enteroscopy on 36 patients who suffered from unexplained GI bleeding. All patients had prior normal results on gastroscopy, colonoscopy, small bowel barium radiography, scintigraphy and/or angiography.

RESULTS

M2A capsule endoscopy disclosed abnormal small bowel findings in 26 (82%) out of 32 patients. Twenty-one of them had significant pathological findings explaining their clinical disorders. Diagnostic yield was therefore 66% (21 of 32 patients). Definite bleeding sites diagnosed by capsule endoscopy in 21 patients included angiodysplasia (8), inflammatory small-bowel (5), small-bowel polyps (4), gastrointestinal stromal tumour (2), carcinoid tumour and lipoma (1), and hemorrhagic gastritis (1). Push enteroscopy detected the definite sources of bleeding in 9 (25%) of the 36 patients. Patients with definite bleeding sources included angiodysplasias (2), leiomyosarcoma (2), leiomyoma (1), lymphoma (1), Crohn's disease (1), small-bowel polyps (1) and adenocarcinoma of ampulla (1). Suspected bleeding sources were shown by push enteroscopy in two additional patients (6%), and in other five patients (16%) by capsule endoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study of patients with obscure GI bleeding showed that capsule endoscopy significantly superior to push enteroscopy in detecting GI bleeding (P < 0.001). Capsule endoscopy is safe and painless, and should become the initial diagnostic choice for patients with obscure GI bleeding.

摘要

背景

在不明原因的胃肠道(GI)出血中,使用传统的放射学、闪烁扫描或血管造影技术往往难以检测出位于小肠的出血部位。推进式小肠镜检查和胶囊内镜检查目前被认为是最有效的诊断方法。本研究的目的是比较胶囊内镜检查和推进式小肠镜检查的检出率。

方法

从2002年5月至2003年1月,我们对39例疑似小肠疾病的患者进行了前瞻性胶囊内镜检查,这些患者来自仁济医院,尤其患有不明原因的胃肠道出血。其中,32例主诉反复不明原因的胃肠道出血。在1993年1月至1996年10月期间,我们对36例患有不明原因胃肠道出血的患者进行了推进式小肠镜检查。所有患者之前的胃镜、结肠镜、小肠钡剂造影、闪烁扫描和/或血管造影结果均正常。

结果

M2A胶囊内镜检查显示,32例患者中有26例(82%)小肠有异常发现。其中21例有显著的病理发现,可解释其临床病症。因此诊断率为66%(32例患者中的21例)。胶囊内镜检查确诊的21例患者的明确出血部位包括血管发育异常(8例)、炎症性小肠(5例)、小肠息肉(4例)、胃肠道间质瘤(2例)、类癌肿瘤和脂肪瘤(1例)以及出血性胃炎(1例)。推进式小肠镜检查在36例患者中的9例(25%)检测到明确的出血来源。明确出血来源的患者包括血管发育异常(2例)、平滑肌肉瘤(2例)、平滑肌瘤(1例)、淋巴瘤(1例)、克罗恩病(1例)、小肠息肉(1例)和壶腹腺癌(1例)。推进式小肠镜检查在另外2例患者(6%)中显示出疑似出血来源,胶囊内镜检查在其他5例患者(16%)中显示出疑似出血来源。

结论

本项针对不明原因胃肠道出血患者的研究表明,在检测胃肠道出血方面,胶囊内镜检查明显优于推进式小肠镜检查(P < 0.001)。胶囊内镜检查安全无痛,应成为不明原因胃肠道出血患者的首选诊断方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验