Marcy Todd R, Britton Mark L, Blevins Steve M
Department of Pharmacy, Clinical and Administrative Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1223, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Sep;38(9):1419-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E072. Epub 2004 Jul 20.
To report a case of hepatotoxicity probably caused by pioglitazone, summarize case reports of hepatotoxicity induced by rosiglitazone or pioglitazone, and make recommendations regarding routine liver enzyme measurement in patients taking these agents.
A 39-year-old black woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and congestive heart failure presented to a pharmacist-staffed diabetes comanagement service. She reported fatigue, dark brown urine, nausea, itching, and loss of appetite. Pioglitazone was promptly discontinued because her symptoms were consistent with those of hepatic dysfunction and pioglitazone was identified as a potential cause. The patient was referred to her physician. Liver enzyme levels were checked 13 days after initial presentation and found to be abnormal: alanine aminotransferase 490 U/L, aspartate aminotransferase 360 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 851 U/L, total bilirubin 3.1 mg/dL, direct bilirubin 2.0 mg/dL, and indirect bilirubin 1.1 mg/dL. Within 2(1/2) months of discontinuing pioglitazone, the patient's symptoms resolved and liver enzyme levels returned to normal.
Troglitazone, a thiazolidinedione (TZD), was removed from the market because of hepatotoxicity. Reported cases involving the newer TZDs, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone, have been few in number and less severe in consequence. Six cases of rosiglitazone-induced hepatotoxicity and 5 of pioglitazone-induced hepatotoxicity have been reported. Most patients improved symptomatically 2-4 weeks following discontinuation of the offending TZD, with normalization of liver enzyme levels in 2 weeks to 6 months following TZD discontinuation.
Although the timeline and extent of liver enzyme elevation in this case are unclear, the Naranjo probability scale suggests that a causal relationship between pioglitazone and liver disease is probable. Patients with previous TZD-induced hepatotoxicity should not be rechallenged. Cases of hepatotoxicity with second generation TZDs, although clearly linked, have been few in number and less severe in consequence when compared to troglitazone. We agree with current package labeling that requires baseline and then periodic measurement of liver enzymes in patients taking pioglitazone or rosiglitazone.
报告1例可能由吡格列酮引起肝毒性的病例,总结罗格列酮或吡格列酮所致肝毒性的病例报告,并对服用这些药物患者的常规肝酶检测提出建议。
一名39岁的黑人女性,患有2型糖尿病、高血压和充血性心力衰竭,前来药剂师参与的糖尿病联合管理服务处就诊。她自述疲劳、尿呈深褐色、恶心、瘙痒及食欲不振。由于其症状与肝功能障碍相符且吡格列酮被确定为潜在病因,遂立即停用吡格列酮。该患者被转诊至其医生处。初次就诊13天后检查肝酶水平,发现异常:丙氨酸氨基转移酶490 U/L,天冬氨酸氨基转移酶360 U/L,碱性磷酸酶851 U/L,总胆红素3.1 mg/dL,直接胆红素2.0 mg/dL,间接胆红素1.1 mg/dL。停用吡格列酮后2个半月内,患者症状消失,肝酶水平恢复正常。
曲格列酮作为一种噻唑烷二酮类(TZD)药物,因肝毒性已退市。涉及较新TZD药物罗格列酮和吡格列酮的报告病例数量较少,后果也较轻。已报告6例罗格列酮所致肝毒性病例和5例吡格列酮所致肝毒性病例。大多数患者在停用相关TZD药物后2 - 4周症状改善,肝酶水平在停用TZD药物后2周内至6个月恢复正常。
尽管该病例中肝酶升高的时间进程和程度尚不清楚,但根据Naranjo概率量表,吡格列酮与肝病之间可能存在因果关系。既往有TZD药物所致肝毒性的患者不应再次使用。第二代TZD药物所致肝毒性病例虽有明确关联,但与曲格列酮相比数量较少,后果也较轻。我们赞同当前药品说明书的要求,即服用吡格列酮或罗格列酮的患者需进行基线肝酶检测,随后定期检测。