Hölmich P, Hölmich L R, Bjerg A M
Amager University Hospital, Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Italiensvej 1, Copenhagen DK-2300 S, Denmark.
Br J Sports Med. 2004 Aug;38(4):446-51. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.004754.
Groin pain is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to sports medicine. The literature provides no consensus on definitions of or diagnostic criteria for groin pain in athletes. To compare the results of research and treatments, the methods used to diagnose and evaluate the degree of groin pain must be clearly defined and reproducible.
To describe clinical examination techniques for groin pain in athletes and evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of these.
Eighteen athletes, nine with sports related groin pain and nine without groin pain, were examined by two doctors and two physiotherapists. The examiners were trained in the examination techniques before the study. The examiners were blinded to the symptoms and identity of the subjects. The subjects were examined twice by each examiner in random order. The examinations included evaluation of adductor muscle related pain and strength, iliopsoas muscle related pain, strength, and flexibility, abdominal muscle related pain, and strength and pain at the symphysis joint. Kappa statistics and percentage of agreement were used to evaluate the data.
Overall, the kappa values and percentage of agreement were in accordance and showed good reliability of the examinations. The kappa values for the intraobserver agreement were above 0.60 in 11 of 14 tests, and those for the interobserver agreement of the pain tests were above 0.60 in eight of 10 tests. The only test without acceptable interobserver reliability was the strength test for iliopsoas muscle.
All but one of the tests investigated were reproducible and subject only to limited intraobserver and interobserver variation.
腹股沟疼痛对运动医学来说是一个诊断和治疗方面的挑战。文献中对于运动员腹股沟疼痛的定义或诊断标准尚未达成共识。为了比较研究和治疗结果,用于诊断和评估腹股沟疼痛程度的方法必须明确界定且具有可重复性。
描述运动员腹股沟疼痛的临床检查技术,并评估这些技术在观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
18名运动员,其中9名患有与运动相关的腹股沟疼痛,9名无腹股沟疼痛,由两名医生和两名物理治疗师进行检查。在研究前,检查人员接受了检查技术方面的培训。检查人员对受试者的症状和身份不知情。每位检查人员以随机顺序对受试者进行两次检查。检查包括评估内收肌相关的疼痛和力量、髂腰肌相关的疼痛、力量和灵活性、腹肌相关的疼痛以及耻骨联合处的疼痛和力量。使用kappa统计量和一致性百分比来评估数据。
总体而言,kappa值和一致性百分比相符,表明检查具有良好的可靠性。在14项测试中的11项中,观察者内一致性的kappa值高于0.60,在10项疼痛测试中的8项中,观察者间一致性的kappa值高于0.60。唯一一项观察者间可靠性不可接受的测试是髂腰肌力量测试。
除一项测试外,所有研究的测试均具有可重复性,且仅存在有限的观察者内和观察者间差异。